It would appear everyone is arguing over different (correct) interpretations of the same word.
"any event that happens unexpectedly, without a deliberate plan or cause."
...Seems to cover everyones view.
Surely a discussion as to road based "risk" and suitable forms of management would be more productive than being so fucking pedantic when everyone is more or less correct anyway?
Oh wait I just remembered what forum I'm on.
As you were.
My 2c, mechanical or medical failure causing a crash is pretty damn rare. Making a mistake as the result of pure human error (I don't even know what that would be, being blinded by the sun possibly) is less rare. Making a mistake as a result of lack of training or discipline (emotional clouding, "it wont happen to me", I'm invincible, road rage, etc.) is more common. I think everyone can agree to that, now what?
If that’s your understanding then I suggest you do a tad more research. There's a deal of pedantry going on, to be sure. Guilty. But the reason for my particular contribution is 'cause I'm sick of being bombarded with the pompous, ill-informed, righteously indignant diatribe from those who seem to think they’ve got some exclusive insight into How Shit Works.
Yes, most crashes have an human element. If you’ve a mind you can point to those and say “you did / didn’t do this / that, and therefore it's NOT an accident and you're a bad, bad person.” But the meanest perusal of behavioural anthropology would uncover the fact that... shock, horror, etc... Humans have remarkably little control over their routine (and therefore driving / riding) behaviour. Across the full breadth of the range of skills from rank beginner to full expert the risks each individual takes is part of them, built in, hard wired.
So diligently regurgitating the sort of anile crap that’s been foisted on us over the years by a stunningly ill informed and singularly ineffective safety culture wears fookin’ thin. Particularly as the evidence repeatedly demonstrates that it is indeed a crock of steaming excriment. And in spite of this the more strident and objectionable rantings have more in common with the louder religious preachings, in that they demand that other people need to change their wicked ways in order for all to be bliss. In a word..Fuck off.
So I’m just here to insist, again, that there is indeed such a thing as an accident. And to suggest that if anyone is desperate to minimise the risks associated with using the road then the very best thing they can do is to find a really thick book on How Shit Works, in the hope that sooner or later they’ll come to the more realistic understanding that it’s not about blame. Not even slightly.
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
Agree with your sentiments on what is an accident, 100%, but I think in todays world blame does feature. Our system of liability, responsibility, insurance, compensation, litigation etc, ....blame has to be aportioned to those involed in an accident to make our legal/insurance/compensation system work....unlike the Govt no fault ACC system![]()
Thank Christ for that. Pity it took 'enough' alcohol to open your mind...although there really are accidents sometimes
Man needs labels to (think he can) understand stuff...
The rules of chaos say that a predictable crash may not actually happen. But would you (or anyone) consider someone who is speeding in a school zone at 8.30am Mon-Fri, and is juggling a coffee and a piece of toast, who then bowls some poor kid, to have had an 'accident'?
Nail meet Head
Agreed.
My problem with the word 'accident' in terms of traffic crashes is that it seems to be used in the sense that the involved can abdicate their responsibility by calling it that. "It was an accident" suggests, not only was it unintentional (fair enough), but also "I couldn't have done anything to stop it happening". No doubt, such a situation does occur, a true accident, but generally speaking - a crash is what it is.
If accident is the wrong word to describe an unintentional, unpredictable event - then, other than Act of God (something that few would agree really exists), then please suggest a word that does cover what I and others interpret 'accident' to mean.![]()
Do you realise how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?
You insist on continuing to display your ignorance in the matter?
Correct.
Incorrect.
It suggests no such thing.
Check the dictionary AGAIN.
Accident means there was no intent.
That's it.
Nothing there at all about avoidability.
Nada.
Zip.
Again:
No intent = accident.
Intent = not accident.
No further corespondence will be entered into on the matter.
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
A reason, perhaps, but there is often no need for blame. To ALWAYS attribute blame is to deny that which makes us human.
Even if we know ALL the factors involved in a given situation ahead of time (an almost impossible task in itself) we cannot quantify all of them exactly. As such we cannot be blamed for an action that could only be seen to have been causitive in hindsight.
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin (1706-90)
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending to much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)
"Motorcycling is not inherently dangerous. It is, however, EXTREMELY unforgiving of inattention, ignorance, incompetence and stupidity!" - Anonymous
"Live to Ride, Ride to Live"
I agree with this - the definition of accident is unintended mishap, there is nothing to say that with more care it couldn't be avoided. Almost every accident of every kind is avoidable - that doesn't make them 'not accidents'. Even accidents around the home like falling off a ladder, cutting yourself with a kitchen knife of burning yourself with the stove are all avoidable accidents, but accidents non the less.
All this arguing about the commonly accepted definition of accident being wrong just seems so silly. All that needed to be said was "most accidents are avoidable" and then this thread could be reduced to about 1/4 of the number of posts.
To summarise:
The only car crashes that are not really accidents are the ones where someone crashes on purpose. But over 99% of all accidents are avoidable.
If we can all agree on this then we can move on to more productive discussion!
I think what we're trying to establish here is that if '"accidents" were seen less as "accidents" we'd all start looking more closely at how we can avoid being part of an accident.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks