
Originally Posted by
Scuba_Steve
a lot less, but if there was no "PIG doing a u-turn" his speed would have been completely irrelevant,
Agreed.

Originally Posted by
Scuba_Steve
the PIG doing a 3-point where he did was dangerous regardles had it been my (road legal) landy at 100km/h (if it could achieve that) instead of the bike
Also agreed.

Originally Posted by
Scuba_Steve
the only difference would be justice. The biker would be alive the PIG car would be a write-off & the PIG would be injured,
At 100kph with 120m to stop and a cometant driver, chances are no collision would have insued.

Originally Posted by
Scuba_Steve
It was a calculated risk most do it
As was the u-turn. Both contributed to the accident in probably about equal measure except for the fact that the cop intended to do a u-turn and mis-calculated the width of the road i.e. he did not know his turning circle at all. Still, it's unfortunate that one paid with his life and the other got away pretty much scott free.
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin (1706-90)
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending to much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)
"Motorcycling is not inherently dangerous. It is, however, EXTREMELY unforgiving of inattention, ignorance, incompetence and stupidity!" - Anonymous
"Live to Ride, Ride to Live"
Bookmarks