What do you claim is the motive? Money?
quote "The motive alleged was that Mark was in serious financial trouble, and murdered his wife for the insurance money.
In actual fact,
When the company Marchris Enterprises was wound up, there was sufficient money to pay all creditors, with some debtors uncollected.
The Salu Vino project had investor's money secured in a trust account without any deductions.
The land he was trying to purchase for the vineyard project fell through without him being committed for the $2,000,000 purchase at Maraekakaho in Hawkes Bay.
The insurance policy increase was not at Mark's request, and nor was he the person that instigated any claim on the policy."
LundyTruth.com
it's not a bad thing till you throw a KLR into the mix.
those cheap ass bitches can do anything with ductape.
(PostalDave on ADVrider)
Well, when you put it that way maybe his bad acting could have been "sincere" but that is not the way the media presented his case back in the day!
Bad KB habit ... never let the facts get in the way of opinions ... it will be interesting ... expensive but interesting!![]()
I think Mark Lundy should become Joseph Parkers punching bag.
NZ Police homicide investigations should be outsourced offshore ... their propensity for fuck ups is just getting too expensive!
The majority get outsourced to the privy council and turned over eventually anyway, so lets just do it up front!![]()
TOP QUOTE: The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other peoples money.
I am going to google up some stats but honestly you are flat wrong.
In the pleece published stats there are 34, 43 and 47 murders in the year ended June 11, 12 and 13 respectively.
of those, the solving rate is 82, 90 and 91 % So of this years ones 42 or 43 were solved. which is interesting innit: you have a 1 in 10 chance of getting away with it! better odds than lotto.
That does not equate to appeals or whatever but (and I cant find stats for it) if you are murdered the most likely person to have done it is your significant other, or a family member, or if you are a criminal scumbag (and a lot are) then by the persons in whose circles you move.. Random stranger ones are almost unheard of.
These few cases (Lundy, (did it) Bain (did it) Watson (did it) etc all share a number of characteristics to my untrained eye: middle class white people involved..... protestations of innocence..... attractive victims. Skeevy details
so they get allll the publicity but statistically they are a tiny minority.
http://www.police.govt.nz/sites/defa...l-20130630.pdf
stats ^
I thought elections were decided by angry posts on social media. - F5 Dave
Interesting response!
I may be flat wrong as you say but the way these things are reported in our media suggests that the way I called is probably correct!
Should the Privy Counsel be reinstated until the Police (homicide squad & Justice etc) get their act back up to speed?![]()
Or should the media be prosecuted (like speeding motorists) for misleading journalism?
Well something is wrong and needs fixing, .... sooner rather than later! ..... IMHO!![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks