Roastbusters

[Brian d marge]

I think it was a media typo
it should have read " pig roast " ... I wouldn’t be bragging

And fellas you lot need to expand your horizons , the stuff I’m hearing ,,, is MILD to those fellas

Stephen

[Zedder]

Maybee you've missed the types of laws being passed under "urgency"

Maybe I did, please post references to the emergency etc.

[Banditbandit]

the 'problem' is that now kids are more aware of the law etc. e.g. there is an awful lot more to the 'age of consent' that just both parties being 16 or over.
sexual connection with a person under 12 = always illegal, end of story.
if one person is aged 13-15, and the other person is aged 20 or under, well theres rather a large gap in the law there, where basically as long as it was consensual, 99% of the time, there is nothing that can be done about it even if it comes to light. theres also nothing legally that can really be done about two people both aged between 13-15 having sex, as long as it was consensual.

I would wonder, if this whole thing is a few years old now, how old were the boys when it happened? were they 15? 16? 17? 19? and how old were the girls?

I dont have TV so I didnt see the news snippet, but how exactly is the 'rape' quantified? because the girl was underage, or because she was physically forced?

there is a difference between an adolescent thinking they are an adult, and making adult decisions, only to later realise they arent an adult, and they have regrets and feel bad for their decisions, vs actually being held down and raped. is there any certainty that this isnt the case here?

No, the is no gap in the law ... sex under 16 is illegal - and consent never comes into it. Legally people under 16 are considered not old enugh to give consent. And it does not matter what the age of the other person is - if both partiers are underaged then both parties are performing an illegal act ... It is illegal for a person under the age of 16 to have sex AND it is ill;egal for persons to have sex with someone under 16 ...

I sat through court cases where both the girl (14) and the boy (15) were successfully prosecuted ... and found guilty ... The girl was pregnant - the parents insisted charges were laid, and the police charged both parties ... both the boy and girl admitted they knew it was illegal and both knew each other's ages - so they were both prosecuted - much to the girl's parents chargin.

There's also a part of the law which means the older person (over 16) has to establish by I/D that the other person is over 16 ...

Separately, there is also a law against "stupifying" someone and raping them .. age doesn't count on that one ...

[duckonin]

Of course many of us "kids" blurred the lines around that age limit (I may or may have not rooted the bloke I eventually married before I turned 16, I cant remember exactly).

Where are the parents of these kids?

You should be able to answer your own question . You were into it before 16. So where were your parents ? Now think clearly, yep you got it.
All kids push boundary's, these 'shit bags' have crossed the boundary big time.

[Naki Rat]

According to an article in todays Horrid, it looks like a complaint was made to the police two years ago.

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/ar...ectid=11152592

I think there is more to this story than has come out yet.

Make that FOUR complaints. Lots of arse covering going on now it would seem

[bluninja]

Make that FOUR complaints. Lots of arse covering going on now it would seem

Scumbags arses, or police arses?

[Akzle]

I sat through court cases where both the girl (14) and the boy (15) were successfully prosecuted ... and found guilty ... The girl was pregnant - the parents insisted charges were laid, and the police charged both parties ... both the boy and girl admitted they knew it was illegal and both knew each other's ages - so they were both prosecuted - much to the girl's parents chargin.

There's also a part of the law which means the older person (over 16) has to establish by I/D that the other person is over 16 ...

the problem here is a) going to crackeroo court and b) 'admitting' shit.

Also, i believe there was a case <5 years ago that established checking her 'ID' (identification, not inner diameter. You filthy engineers) was not conridered enough to verify her age. The implied ramifications are hilarious.
Phone her parents

[Akzle]

Scumbags arses, or police arses?

difference?

[Zedder]

the problem here is a) going to crackeroo court and b) 'admitting' shit.

Also, i believe there was a case <5 years ago that established checking her 'ID' (identification, not inner diameter. You filthy engineers) was not conridered enough to verify her age. The implied ramifications are hilarious.
Phone her parents

You left out c) And shit.

[bluninja]

difference?

You'd need to check a Venn diagram.

[Akzle]

You left out c) And shit.

if a) and b) are heeded, there is no c) or shit.

But thats what i love about school girls, i keep getting older, they stay the same age...

[Zedder]

if a) and b) are heeded, there is no c) or shit.

But thats what i love about school girls, i keep getting older, they stay the same age...

That took you a while but it's "And shit" not "or shit". If ya gunna start a phrase keep it consistant.

School girls? I thought you were having enough trouble working out the difference between the two types of arses as per your earlier post...

[Akzle]

That took you a while but it's "And shit" not "or shit". If ya gunna start a phrase keep it consistant.

School girls? I thought you were having enough trouble working out the difference between the two types of arses as per your earlier post...

ill do what i like. Concerning phraseology, arseology. And shit.
-ology.

[avgas]

established checking her 'ID' (identification, not inner diameter. You filthy engineers)

Always wear gumboots when dealing with tunnels.

[Zedder]

ill do what i like. Concerning phraseology, arseology. And shit.
-ology.

And punctuation/use of capitals-ology.