Mecanical strength for one, round is simply the strongest cross section available (when pressurized).
Look at what happen when hydroforming a pipe for example.
Now, the exhasust pulses are of lower magnitude, but a pipe with "squarish" walls will behave lot more like a speaker membrane than a round pipe with the same wall thickness would.
Pinky has been given a new heart and it's not too far off ready to make a blue haze. Wiring and ignition is next on the list.
That will be great.
So, white bodywork and flowers?
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
Yamaha did that with their first version of the TZ750. Those pipes were not just oval, they really had flat-sided bellies (don't we wish we had too?)
Those TZ750-pipes cracked like mad. One temporary cure was to drill a small hole through the middle of each flat, poke a bicycle spoke through the holes and butt-weld it to the flat sheet areas, so these could no longer vibrate in- and outward quite so much.
Changing the pipe from round to oval can be done in several ways. If you keep the circumference constant, the cross flow area will decrease. Just imagine pushing the pipe flat: the circumference will still be the same but the cross flow area and the pipe volume will become zero.
You'll want to keep the cross flow area and the pipe volume equal to that of the round pipe, so initially you will have to give it a bigger circumference at the place where you are going to flatten it afterwards. And then the power loss should be minimal.
That's not the squish angle; it's the squish edge angle; the squish angle is variable because of the spheric squish band.
Imagine the vertical line through the center of the piston dome radius. Then imagine a line through the center of the piston dome radius and the upper timing edge of the piston. The angle between those two lines is 8,17° for a piston with a 54 mm bore and a 190 mm dome radius.
Thank you for the offer Lodgernz. But I think those two pictures are not relevant here; they deal with the cross flow area shape of a curved pipe, not with a straight pipe that is pushed out of round.
Besides, those pictures are available for all to see; there is no need to register here or anywhere else. You'll find them at https://drive.google.com/drive/folde...rNTk89_KgwgWof in the folder FOS Tips & Concepts
[QUOTE=senso;1130750329]
yes, that I know. that's what I draw in Solidworks. I just didn't understand why you used that angle. but I think I get it now. I use a "parralel angle" which corresponds with the straight line from the outer edge to the inner edge of the squish band, and also cut my squish in the head straight which off course gives a small deviation, but in my world my tolerances are a lot bigger than in Aprillia's GP-world .
I was entering all the RSA data into my spreadsheet to test it but that angle didn't work and now I know why.
So you use the tangent angle because it is the only angle you can mathematicaly true define,![]()
There are currently 10 users browsing this thread. (1 members and 9 guests)
Bookmarks