I agree, with Ixions wise words. Bikeoi-2 runs risks of; a.) ho hum it is them whinging bikers again, and b.) If it is smaller than Bikeoi-1 it then it runs the risk of sending a message that bikers interest in the issue is declining.
We should pause, and let the Nat's make their decision. Will they back down? I doubt it... but we'll know in late December.
If we are still unsatisfied after the decision is announced, then we should announce our dissatisfaction and the start of a major civil disobedience campaign..... masses of registrations 'on-hold' etc etc ....
http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/im...lies/2guns.gif.
In the meantime we should all write to ACC seeking access to their analysis of the recent phoney submissions process ( citing the Information Act etc.) Based on this research we might find good grounds to mount a legal challenge on the ACC's phoney process and/or a Judicial review.
I strongly recommend that if we ever plan a Bikeoi-2 - let us do it in conjunction with ALL the others that are unhappy with the Nat's privatisation agenda for ACC. If we combine with the Greens, Labour, Unions, Counsellors, etc etc a combined Bikeoi-2 could be HUGE...... but first we must wait... as much depends on the nature of what the Nats decide.
Bookmarks