Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17

Thread: FOR SALE: CBR250R mc19

  1. #1
    Join Date
    17th April 2006 - 10:14
    Bike
    '01 VTR SP1, '92 NSR300, rm125,
    Location
    shitsville
    Posts
    353

    FOR SALE: CBR250R mc19

    sadly i, selling cause want a RR or a 2 smoker :P
    this bike is seen on sevral kiwibiker rides,
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	123.JPG 
Views:	78 
Size:	68.1 KB 
ID:	30931CBR250R mc19
    NZ new/im first NZ owner
    new front/rear sprockets
    new o-ring chain (lubed after each ride)
    new rear tyre
    new oil and filter (good oil used)
    mint shocks
    mint brakes
    reliable / economical
    carburator clean/balance (last week)
    learner scars (cosmetic , tidy con)
    current wof & reg

    $4000 ono
    reciepts available, work done at HENDERSON MOTORCYLCES ,

  2. #2
    Join Date
    17th April 2006 - 10:14
    Bike
    '01 VTR SP1, '92 NSR300, rm125,
    Location
    shitsville
    Posts
    353
    ?????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????

  3. #3
    Join Date
    14th February 2005 - 17:33
    Bike
    .
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    1,718
    I know its unlikely. but would you be interested in selling the fairings only?
    I only posted this because of the global economic crisis

  4. #4
    Join Date
    21st June 2005 - 20:11
    Bike
    .
    Location
    .
    Posts
    1,929
    How many ks?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    17th September 2005 - 18:28
    Bike
    Boulevard, Ducati.
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    1,790
    It has 32,000 heresw the link to the auction on trademe.

    http://www.trademe.co.nz/Browse/List...423&key=387292

  6. #6
    Join Date
    11th June 2005 - 14:42
    Bike
    2005 Honda CBR600RR
    Location
    Otahuhu
    Posts
    540
    Any reason that you want to change from a R to an RR?
    Sleep is for the weak.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    17th February 2005 - 11:36
    Bike
    Bikes!
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    9,649
    If you ride them both you'll know. The R is a gutless armchair, the RR is quite fun.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    13th March 2005 - 17:09
    Bike
    Mid 80s superbike, Mid 00s superbike
    Location
    Whangarei, without an F
    Posts
    2,658
    Quote Originally Posted by imdying
    If you ride them both you'll know. The R is a gutless armchair, the RR is quite fun.
    That's odd, they both have the same engine and box
    Quote Originally Posted by Dean View Post
    Ok im coming out of my closet just this one time , I too kinda have a curvy figure which makes it worse beacuse im a guy. Well the waist kinda goes in and the bum pushes out. When I was in college the girls in my year would slap me on the arse and squeeze because apparently it is firm, tight... I wear jeans
    .....if I find this as a signature Ill hunt you down, serious, capice?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    26th February 2005 - 15:10
    Bike
    Ubrfarter V Klunkn,ffwabbit,Petal,phoebe
    Location
    In the cave of Adullam
    Posts
    13,624
    But, the RR has more stickers!
    Quote Originally Posted by skidmark
    This world has lost it's drive, everybody just wants to fit in the be the norm as it were.
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
    The manufacturers go to a lot of trouble to find out what the average rider prefers, because the maker who guesses closest to the average preference gets the largest sales. But the average rider is mainly interested in silly (as opposed to useful) “goodies” to try to kid the public that he is riding a racer

  10. #10
    Join Date
    17th February 2005 - 11:36
    Bike
    Bikes!
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    9,649
    They're vastly different in the engine... I'm guessing valve sizes, port sizes, carb sizes, cam profile. The redline is 19k on the RR, and 17 on the R iirc. Not only that, sit on the R... feels horrible.. like a seat from primary school. It's a totally different riding position to the RR. R has 16" front wheel (18" rear??), much better handling from the 17/17 combo on the RR.

    R is a great learners bike, but gets old real quick. The RR is the sort of toy that you'd consider hanging onto after you're on your full.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    16th August 2005 - 12:00
    Bike
    Left Jandal
    Location
    Too Close
    Posts
    874
    your not in sales are you imdying... you sound more like the buying type

  12. #12
    Join Date
    29th September 2003 - 20:48
    Bike
    2008 DRZ400E & 1983 CB152T
    Location
    Alexandra
    Posts
    4,158
    Quote Originally Posted by imdying
    They're vastly different in the engine... I'm guessing valve sizes, port sizes, carb sizes, cam profile. The redline is 19k on the RR, and 17 on the R iirc. Not only that, sit on the R... feels horrible.. like a seat from primary school. It's a totally different riding position to the RR. R has 16" front wheel (18" rear??), much better handling from the 17/17 combo on the RR.

    R is a great learners bike, but gets old real quick. The RR is the sort of toy that you'd consider hanging onto after you're on your full.
    No no no, engines are exactly from MC19 to MC22. Tacho shows different redline but rev limiter still kicks in at same place. Only differences (apart from asthetics) are "banana" swingarm and double front discs (as opposed to a single front on the MC19.

    Obviously the MC22 looks way way better and doesn't look too out of place with the modern bikes. I've never ridden a MC19 but owned a MC22 for a year or so and they are fucking cool bikes.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    17th February 2005 - 11:36
    Bike
    Bikes!
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    9,649
    I'm pretty sure that the engines are different... they certaintly feel different. iirc, the carbs are definitely different, and so are the cam profiles. Please don't ride the mc19 K14, you'll destroy your cbr250 memories.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    14th February 2005 - 17:33
    Bike
    .
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    1,718
    Quote Originally Posted by imdying
    I'm pretty sure that the engines are different...
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CBR250
    (damn thats a sexy CBR in the picture )

    Quote Originally Posted by wikipedia

    1989 CBR250R(K) (MC19). Essentially identical to the R(J), except now had a speed limiter which was set at 185 km/h.

    1990-1991 CBR250RR(L) (MC22). A completely new redesigned bike that features a new cast/pressed aluminium frame that gives a more aggressive riding position, gull shaped swing arm that was adopted from the NSR250, higher rising tail, six spoke cast aluminium wheels and dual front φ276 mm floating disk brakes.

    The only feature that was adopted from the previous model CBR250s was the original MC14E engine. This too was slightly modified with a crankshaft that featured φ27.5 mm small-end journals, up φ0.5 mm from the previous φ27 mm journals. The engine also uses a completely new set of VP carburettors that feature smaller throats reduced from φ32 mm to φ30.5 mm. These carburettors are now feed by a vacuum operated pump for fuel delivery.
    I only posted this because of the global economic crisis

  15. #15
    Join Date
    17th February 2005 - 11:36
    Bike
    Bikes!
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    9,649
    Yeah, saw some other pages like that after a nose around.

    Looks like cam profiles, carbs, journal sizes, valves sizes etc changes, but the block essentially remained the same. Interesting to note the shape of the power curves... looks like the later ones were pretty restricted. Wonder if anyone does an unrestricted cdi for them?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •