Serious question from me for a change...
Was reading a review of the latest Fireblade in the local rag last night and noted comments about the slipper clutch.
I have not ridden a bike with a slipper clutch so have no first hand experience of such. (I know all about slippING clutches though from the bad old days of Velocette ownership...)
My first reaction would be that I would rather have a standard clutch since I rely quite heavily on engine braking when I ride. I feel I would hate to be reliant on brakes alone - I like the control that engine braking provides. It feels to me that I gain another, maybe, 20% over using brakes alone...
But then, I have not ridden a large displacement IL4 so have no real idea of the amount of back torque such an engine would provide nor how much of it the slipper clutch removes. The SVS does have quite serious engine braking capabilities which I use to the full, although ya do have to watch for rear wheel lockup...
So, those of you who know what they are talking about, what is the real deal on the Slipper Clutch? How serious is the back torque from engines on bikes they are fitted to? How much engine braking does it remove? How different is the experience with and without a slipper clutch? Etc Etc Etc.
All answers read with interest....
Bookmarks