I'm sure if I was to look into the detail of each investigation, then we would see each one was focused on a different aspect - but let's presume that it was 10 investigations about the exact same thing:
On the base facts, what Hillary did with her email server was worse than what Trump has done at Mar-A-Lago:
1: It deliberately bypassed corporate security policy
2: When subpeoned, the data was mysteriously 'lost'
You mean "Issuing a Memo that he's taking home a number of boxes and declassifying them as was his right as President up until the inauguration", that the FBI knew about, asked him to put a lock on the door and await for further instruction?
Bit of a different story.
See, if the voters were as concerned as you are about it, then surely they would reject the candidates that Trump endorsed and the ones who, according to you, participated in 'the big lie'
Yet, they have not. Whether the entire Republican voterbase believes the election was outright rigged or they are merely skeptical of some of the abnormalities - the voters are clearly not as invested.
I'm pointing to the impeachment as an example of the voters making their thoughts and feelings known at the ballot box for they think of the RINOs that betrayed their party.
Why are they disillusioned? Surely Biden has been the best President ever?
I can tell you why they are disillusioned: The absolute failure of Biden is proving to them that Trump wasn't that bad. That their lives were better under Trump and they cannot bear to admit that to themselves.
They are disillusioned, because the ideological cows have come home to roost and the wider public is pushing back on it - they know they are about to pay for their metaphorical crimes against the country and all that power and influence is about to be yeeted away from them.
And I cannot wait.
As for the court cases - Again, I've acknowledged that I cannot meet the 'beyond all reasonable doubt' burden of proof to win a court case. As a single example - you want me to believe that Joe Biden got a greater share of the Black vote than the first Black president of the US... Seems Legit.
I mean, that would make a great Tui ad....
The only 'evidence' that Fred Trump was a white supremecist was him being arrested at a KKK rally... in the 1920s the details do not confirm whether he was there as part of the Klan.
Even then - the 1920s, I think there is a 'Man of the times' defence here. Not saying it's right - only that the Klan in the 1920s was much more... 'Socially acceptable' than in later years. Again, to be clear - Klan is bad and was always bad.
There's no other solid evidence that he was a White Supremacist. He even changed his Moustache style because the one he favored was worn by one Adolf...
Considering the impetus for the investigation was a lie, I'm more than happy to say 'Fruit of the Rotten tree' and hand waive it all away.
But since I know that won't give you satisfaction, how about this: Guilt by association.
And if that day never comes, if despite all the investigations, all the witch hunts, all the BS accusations that no conviction is forthcoming, then what?
Will you admit that you were wrong all this time - afterall - you proudly proclaim that loosing 50 court cases must mean something, so if the same is true for Trump that he's not been convicted in 50 court cases or 100 court cases or 1,000 - then what?
See - for all the accusations you levy at me - allow me to fire one back:
That last statements sounds like regardless of the evidence, regardless of acquittals, you have already decided Trump won the ele... sorry 'is a criminal'
You give me a hard time (as is only fair) when I say I have doubts about the Election, for a multitude of reasons - yet my position is far softer on that issue than your position is on Trump - so do I give you an equally hard time?
Bookmarks