PDA

View Full Version : The fascist regime that made you a moron: Thanks dJonkey



Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11

mashman
12th June 2014, 12:57
You're easy! Makes my job much easier I spose

Do you need me to play a little hard to get?

oldrider
12th June 2014, 15:33
:love: Love is in the air! :wait:

Winston001
13th June 2014, 00:45
My thanks to Bandit, Oscar, Bogan and others.

What is interesting is that I took Akzle to task and he responded with decency.




Ive also started using gew, to differentiate further.
I really shouldnt have to explain this again.
No offence to your wife and kids.

I respect this.


Mashie however has continued to dig far down into a dark and nasty hole without any recognition of what he is doing. Sad.

avgas
13th June 2014, 07:30
tigger .
Fixed it for you.

BoristheBiter
13th June 2014, 07:32
My thanks to Bandit, Oscar, Bogan and others.

What is interesting is that I took Akzle to task and he responded with decency.



I respect this.



Really?

He still uses jew as an insult, just not on the open part of the forum as he has seen what has happened to mashy.
He is still a bigoted little shit and tries to hide behind a different spelling while still meaning the same thing.

mashman
13th June 2014, 07:50
Mashie however has continued to dig far down into a dark and nasty hole without any recognition of what he is doing. Sad.

Without any recognition? You need new glasses... and a backbone.

mashman
13th June 2014, 07:55
Really?

He still uses jew as an insult, just not on the open part of the forum as he has seen what has happened to mashy.
He is still a bigoted little shit and tries to hide behind a different spelling while still meaning the same thing.

Bro, it's obviously ok as long as you change the spelling... the definition may remain the same, but if it's spelled differently it changes everything. Such principles I can only hope that my kids don't grow up with... but I guess that's all that old people understand. Shame really.

BoristheBiter
13th June 2014, 08:06
Bro, it's obviously ok as long as you change the spelling... the definition may remain the same, but if it's spelled differently it changes everything. Such principles I can only hope that my kids don't grow up with... but I guess that's all that old people understand. Shame really.

Keep digging mate, hopefully you will fall out the other side.

:killingme "the definition may remain the same, but if it's spelled differently it changes everything":facepalm:

You really need help with...............well just some help.

Akzle
13th June 2014, 08:17
Really?

He still uses jew as an insult, just not on the open part of the forum as he has seen what has happened to mashy.
He is still a bigoted little shit and tries to hide behind a different spelling while still meaning the same thing.

fuck up you gew cunt.
Now, wheres that "akzle mentions jews" thread. That one pretty well summed it up...

Oscar
13th June 2014, 08:56
Bro, it's obviously ok as long as you change the spelling... the definition may remain the same, but if it's spelled differently it changes everything. Such principles I can only hope that my kids don't grow up with... but I guess that's all that old people understand. Shame really.

Bigoted cunt.

BoristheBiter
13th June 2014, 10:24
fuck up you gew cunt.
Now, wheres that "akzle mentions jews" thread. That one pretty well summed it up...

Make sense retard.:motu:

mashman
13th June 2014, 10:29
Bigoted cunt.

From you that means absolutely nothing. That you feel it pertinent to associate the definition I gave with the Jewish people is highly insulting to them... so really if there's a bigoted cunt in here, it's you. I made the distinction, you put the two together to fuel your rage towards me. By all means rage at me, but please leave the Jewish people alone, they've done nothing wrong, bigot.

Oscar
13th June 2014, 10:33
From you that means absolutely nothing. That you feel it pertinent to associate the definition I gave with the Jewish people is highly insulting to them... so really if there's a bigoted cunt in here, it's you. I made the distinction, you put the two together to fuel your rage towards me. By all means rage at me, but please leave the Jewish people alone, they've done nothing wrong, bigot.

You spend a lot of time defending nothing.
Your definition was only your attempt to deflect anger about your antisemitic ravings.
It is perfectly clear what you meant.
You can twist and turn all you like, but you are a bigoted cunt.

mashman
13th June 2014, 10:33
Keep digging mate, hopefully you will fall out the other side.

:killingme "the definition may remain the same, but if it's spelled differently it changes everything":facepalm:

You really need help with...............well just some help.

lol... I ain't digggin nothin... if you;re seeing me diggin, then you're hallucinating and should put the drugs down immediately.

mashman
13th June 2014, 10:35
Your definition was only your attempt to deflect anger about your antisemitic ravings.
It is perfectly clear what you meant.
You can twist and turn all you like, but you are a bigoted cunt.

No it wasn't.
It was, yet you still managed to get the wrong end of the stick :facepalm:
No I'm not... and I've clearly established, as you have clearly demonstrated, that your insistence to the contrary highlights your bigotry.

Oscar
13th June 2014, 10:36
No it wasn't.
It was, yet you still managed to get the wrong end of the stick :facepalm:
No I'm not... and I've clearly established, as you have clearly demonstrated, that your insistence to the contrary highlights your bigotry.

So you didn't use the word "jew" as an adjective?

BoristheBiter
13th June 2014, 11:21
lol... I ain't digggin nothin... if you;re seeing me diggin, then you're hallucinating and should put the drugs down immediately.

You contradicted yourself in the same sentence and you're telling me I'm on drugs?

I would say you should have just let it go but man you're a dog with bone.

mashman
13th June 2014, 11:31
So you didn't use the word "jew" as an adjective?

Nope......... you did.

unstuck
13th June 2014, 11:34
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/XRGd0gD0QNE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>:banana::banana::banana:

mashman
13th June 2014, 11:34
You contradicted yourself in the same sentence and you're telling me I'm on drugs?

I would say you should have just let it go but man you're a dog with bone.

No I didn't.

I could have and did think about it for all of 1 second. Turns out it's easier to walk away than it is to laugh achall... hardly surprising you'd take the easy way out, fascists usually do.

Oscar
13th June 2014, 11:37
Nope......... you did.

Now you're a bigoted lying cunt.

mashman
13th June 2014, 11:38
:banana::banana::banana:

Would appear I is the stronger person if he isn't powerful enough to affect my emotions, just sayin. :D

mashman
13th June 2014, 11:40
Now you're a bigoted lying cunt.

No that's you... although I would imagine that lying to yourself goes hand in hand with being myopic.

BoristheBiter
13th June 2014, 11:57
No I didn't.



"the definition may remain the same, but if it's spelled differently it changes everything"

yes you did.

Oscar
13th June 2014, 12:00
No that's you... although I would imagine that lying to yourself goes hand in hand with being myopic.


A jew is not a Jew in the sense that they are Jewish. A Catholic can be a jew, as can be a Muslim, as can an atheist, as can be any religious denomination you choose... it has feck all to do with the church, it's a state of mind and primarily involves fucking people over... more often than not using money as the weapon.


Go on, explain again how that comment is not antisemitic...

Voltaire
13th June 2014, 12:11
Back in 1973/74 the phrase " don't be a Jew" referred to a purchaser of lollies from the tuck shop being unwilling to share them and there was a kid with the last name of Jew too.
It was a Catholic School so was probably Antisemitic by default. Can't say we related it to not getting free black or red jubes.

mashman
13th June 2014, 12:28
Go on, explain again how that comment is not antisemitic...

I don't hate Jewish people, don't hate their culture, don't hate their philosophy etc... as mentioned in the post you have replied to. Yet you still refuse to accept that. As I said, your choice.

Akzle
13th June 2014, 12:41
Go on, explain again how that comment is not antisemitic...

okay, this will BLOW your MIND.

... the word "jew".... has NOTHING TO DO WITH JEWISH FUCKERS in this context, AS CLEARLY EXPLAINED to your dumb ass ABOUT FIVE TIMES NOW

mashman
13th June 2014, 12:50
okay, this will BLOW your MIND.

... the word "jew".... has NOTHING TO DO WITH JEWISH FUCKERS in this context, AS CLEARLY EXPLAINED to your dumb ass ABOUT FIVE TIMES NOW

Enhance your calm John Spartan... be well.

Oscar
13th June 2014, 12:54
okay, this will BLOW your MIND.

... the word "jew".... has NOTHING TO DO WITH JEWISH FUCKERS in this context, AS CLEARLY EXPLAINED to your dumb ass ABOUT FIVE TIMES NOW

What are you, 12 years old?
Repeating the same bullshit five times doesn't make it true.

Using the word in that context is exactly what makes it offensive.
If it has nothing to do with Jews, why use the word "jew", you stupid fucker?

Oscar
13th June 2014, 12:58
I don't hate Jewish people, don't hate their culture, don't hate their philosophy etc... as mentioned in the post you have replied to. Yet you still refuse to accept that. As I said, your choice.

...and yet you insist that it's OK to use their name as a derogatory adjective?


Tell you what, why don’t you pop down to your local Synagogue and explain your theory to them? Record what happens on your phone.

mashman
13th June 2014, 13:22
...and yet you insist that it's OK to use their name as a derogatory adjective?


Tell you what, why don’t you pop down to your local Synagogue and explain your theory to them? Record what happens on your phone.

Do I? Tis news to me. I think I also said mentioned that I wasn't using it as an adjective too.

:killingme yeah, it's a theory :facepalm:... I suppose I could go and explain the situation and say that there's a guy online, let's call him Oscar, who told me to do this because he hates Jews and he wanted me to randomly inflict his antisemetic bullshit upon the members of the local Synagogue whilst hiding behind me and keeping himself looking whiter than a white mutherfucka, but twice as callous and spineless.

Oscar
13th June 2014, 13:34
Do I? Tis news to me. I think I also said mentioned that I wasn't using it as an adjective too.

:killingme yeah, it's a theory :facepalm:... I suppose I could go and explain the situation and say that there's a guy online, let's call him Oscar, who told me to do this because he hates Jews and he wanted me to randomly inflict his antisemetic bullshit upon the members of the local Synagogue whilst hiding behind me and keeping himself looking whiter than a white mutherfucka, but twice as callous and spineless.

I don't need to help you, your own quote is fine: it's a state of mind and primarily involves fucking people over... more often than not using money as the weapon..

Ps. Why would I hate Jews?

Banditbandit
13th June 2014, 14:05
okay, this will BLOW your MIND.

... the word "jew".... has NOTHING TO DO WITH JEWISH FUCKERS in this context, AS CLEARLY EXPLAINED to your dumb ass ABOUT FIVE TIMES NOW

'And the word "motorcycle" has nothing to do, officer, with the context of speeding as you are trying to suggest'

Akzle
13th June 2014, 14:07
What are you, 12 years old?
Repeating the same bullshit five times doesn't make it true.

Using the word in that context is exactly what makes it offensive.
If it has nothing to do with Jews, why use the word "jew", you stupid fucker?

you must be retarded, theres no point in going to the synagogue BECAUSE ITS NOTHING TO DO WITH JEWISH FUCKERS.
Why use the word gew/jew, because thats sums the shit up nicely. Like i think youre a fucking homo, but thats nothing to do with the ymca.
Like youre a nigger, but i have no doubt youre melanin deficient.

Akzle
13th June 2014, 14:09
'And the word "motorcycle" has nothing to do, officer, with the context of speeding as you are trying to suggest'

the infringement is not 'speeding' its BEING CAUGHT exceeding the POSTED limit. Unless of course you have a prior claim of right....

Oscar
13th June 2014, 14:19
you must be retarded, theres no point in going to the synagogue BECAUSE ITS NOTHING TO DO WITH JEWISH FUCKERS.
Why use the word gew/jew, because thats sums the shit up nicely. Like i think youre a fucking homo, but thats nothing to do with the ymca.
Like youre a nigger, but i have no doubt youre melanin deficient.

My apologies for inferring you were 12 years old.
It is apparent that you can't be more than 5 years old.

mashman
13th June 2014, 14:28
I don't need to help you, your own quote is fine: it's a state of mind and primarily involves fucking people over... more often than not using money as the weapon..

Ps. Why would I hate Jews?

Didn't realise I'd asked for help... hang on, you're putting words into my mouth again arencha.

Dunno, that's your problem, but it's quite obvious given your lack of want to comprehend a reference that has nothing to do with being Jewish, and to level it at the door of the Jewish people. I guess you must really hate Jewish people for some reason.

BoristheBiter
13th June 2014, 15:11
you must be retarded, theres no point in going to the synagogue BECAUSE ITS NOTHING TO DO WITH JEWISH FUCKERS.
Why use the word gew/jew, because thats sums the shit up nicely. Like i think youre a fucking homo, but thats nothing to do with the ymca.
Like youre a nigger, but i have no doubt youre melanin deficient.

so by saying jew you're not being offensive to Jews but you use the word jew as an offensive word.

And you can't see the problem with it?

Akzle
13th June 2014, 15:17
so by saying jew you're not being offensive to Jews but you use the word jew as an offensive word.


maybe youre not at dumb as you smell after all.

If i say, "a kick in the nuts is defined, for this conversation, as 50$" then offer you a kick in the nuts, what chu gonna do?

oldrider
13th June 2014, 15:55
Meanwhile back in the jungle? :shifty:

Oscar
13th June 2014, 16:28
Didn't realise I'd asked for help... hang on, you're putting words into my mouth again arencha.

Dunno, that's your problem, but it's quite obvious given your lack of want to comprehend a reference that has nothing to do with being Jewish, and to level it at the door of the Jewish people. I guess you must really hate Jewish people for some reason.

My Grandmother was Jewish.
By definition (just like John Key) that made my Father Jewish.

Your heritage is unclear, apart from the fact that you are a bigoted, stupid cunt.

Banditbandit
13th June 2014, 16:30
<img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-kyulwGWIzbI/UxMFgES-SXI/AAAAAAAAFyQ/c3Gcu9Ff2zk/s1600/Meanwhile+back+in+the+jungle......jpg" width="400px"/>

BoristheBiter
13th June 2014, 16:32
maybe youre not at dumb as you smell after all.

If i say, "a kick in the nuts is defined, for this conversation, as 50$" then offer you a kick in the nuts, what chu gonna do?

Shoot you in the head?

The problem you have is with your definition.
You are using it in exactly the same way as it is used to be offensive.

You should use the term "your white overlords" as then everyone will know what you mean and no offense to any peoples can be taken as I doubt "your white overlords" give a shit what some one says on a forum.

unstuck
13th June 2014, 16:33
Your heritage is unclear, .

Nope, we have already established he is of palestinian goat decent.:yes:

BoristheBiter
13th June 2014, 16:33
My Grandmother was Jewish.
By definition (just like John Key) that made my Father Jewish.

Your heritage is unclear, apart from the fact that you are a bigoted, stupid cunt.

He's welsh.

BoristheBiter
13th June 2014, 16:34
Nope, we have already established he is of palestinian goat decent.:yes:

That's akzle.

unstuck
13th June 2014, 16:38
That's akzle.

And so it is........:doh:

Banditbandit
13th June 2014, 16:39
the infringement is not 'speeding' its BEING CAUGHT exceeding the POSTED limit. Unless of course you have a prior claim of right....

Just sing along now . to the tune of the Pink Panther

Pedant, pedant, pedant pedant pedant ...

And if that's too subtle for you - tough fucking shit !!!

BoristheBiter
13th June 2014, 16:39
And so it is........:doh:

Although it might not be far from the truth.

unstuck
13th June 2014, 16:40
Although it might not be far from the truth.

I couldn't possibly comment. :shutup:

Banditbandit
13th June 2014, 16:41
maybe youre not at dumb as you smell after all.

If i say, "a kick in the nuts is defined, for this conversation, as 50$" then offer you a kick in the nuts, what chu gonna do?

Kick you in the nuts and take your $50.

Akzle
13th June 2014, 16:56
He's welsh.

oi! No need to be fucking rude!

Akzle
13th June 2014, 17:00
My Grandmother was Jewish.
By definition (just like John Key) that made my Father Jewish.

Your heritage is unclear, apart from the fact that you are a bigoted, stupid cunt.

like "yaweh is god" Jewish, or "enslave you and your sons by corporate debt" jewish?

My heritage doesnt matter, but that i am of god. (so are you, bro!)
i aim only to move forward.

mashman
13th June 2014, 17:28
My Grandmother was Jewish.
By definition (just like John Key) that made my Father Jewish.

Your heritage is unclear, apart from the fact that you are a bigoted, stupid cunt.

So what?

I'm aware of my history thanks aaaaaaaaaand I'm still not bigoted.

mashman
13th June 2014, 17:30
Shoot you in the head?

The problem you have is with your definition.
You are using it in exactly the same way as it is used to be offensive.

You should use the term "your white overlords" as then everyone will know what you mean and no offense to any peoples can be taken as I doubt "your white overlords" give a shit what some one says on a forum.

I come from the other side of the world and know what he meant when he used the term. white muthafuckas acceptable to you numbnutz?

mashman
13th June 2014, 17:34
Nope, we have already established he is of palestinian goat decent.:yes:

Should that be goat-decent (as in the family name of the goat) or goat descent? Or have they dropped the 's' from the word in New Zealand. Serious question bro, I wouldn't wanna get that one wrong too, my name would be mud.

mashman
13th June 2014, 17:35
He's welsh.

Who is?.......

Akzle
13th June 2014, 17:38
Should that be goat-decent (as in the family name of the goat) or goat descent? Or have they dropped the 's' from the word in New Zealand. Serious question bro, I wouldn't wanna get that one wrong too, my name would be mud.

i installed descent the other day, asides from having to severely alter the mouse input, its gone good.

Still struggling to configure my soundblaster 16 though.

mashman
13th June 2014, 17:42
like "yaweh is god" Jewish, or "enslave you and your sons by corporate debt" jewish?

My heritage doesnt matter, but that i am of god. (so are you, bro!)
i aim only to move forward.

heh.

On a spinnin rock in the middle of nowhere like.
+1.. but some folks are just stuck in their .... nice moon tonight.

mashman
13th June 2014, 17:43
i installed descent the other day, asides from having to severely alter the mouse input, its gone good.

Still struggling to configure my soundblaster 16 though.

Fuckin geek. I hate computers.

BoristheBiter
13th June 2014, 17:58
I come from the other side of the world and know what he meant when he used the term. white muthafuckas acceptable to you numbnutz?

What he said and what he meant are two different things as he posts below.


like "yaweh is god" Jewish, or "enslave you and your sons by corporate debt" jewish?

My heritage doesnt matter, but that i am of god. (so are you, bro!)
i aim only to move forward.

So you believe in imaginary people then, explains a lot.

unstuck
13th June 2014, 18:00
Should that be goat-decent (as in the family name of the goat) or goat descent? Or have they dropped the 's' from the word in New Zealand. Serious question bro, I wouldn't wanna get that one wrong too, my name would be mud.

Descent.:Oops:

mashman
13th June 2014, 18:32
What he said and what he meant are two different things as he posts below.

How do you know what he said and what he meant were two different things? Are you sure that he didn't say what he meant and that you are mistaken?

BoristheBiter
13th June 2014, 19:03
How do you know what he said and what he meant were two different things? Are you sure that he didn't say what he meant and that you are mistaken?

It's called communication. We use words to do it. We have meanings for those words so others can understand what we mean.
He, and you, use the word jew, as Scuba posted it has two meanings end of story. If you want to mean something other than those two meanings you should use a different word or words.

Yes meanings of words do have others meanings added to them when they become everyday words, hence why they update dictionary's.
You both use the word jew in a derogatory way as per the second meaning and as there are no other noraml everyday meaning to it the only things we can take from this is a) you have used the word wrongly or b) you are both bigots.

I really hope it's a.:yes:

mashman
13th June 2014, 19:20
It's called communication. We use words to do it. We have meanings for those words so others can understand what we mean.
He, and you, use the word jew, as Scuba posted it has two meanings end of story. If you want to mean something other than those two meanings you should use a different word or words.

Yes meanings of words do have others meanings added to them when they become everyday words, hence why they update dictionary's.
You both use the word jew in a derogatory way as per the second meaning and as there are no other noraml everyday meaning to it the only things we can take from this is a) you have used the word wrongly or b) you are both bigots.

I really hope it's a.:yes:

We don't use the word in that way you are suggesting we do. I shall say this once, just for the hard of hearing, we used the meaning in a way that you are unfamiliar with. That you cannot accept this is not our problem. And you can't accept that, because, as you highlight yourself, you only know 2 uses for the word. Seriously this putting words in other people's mouths really isn't your forte. :yawn:

BoristheBiter
13th June 2014, 20:07
We don't use the word in that way you are suggesting we do. I shall say this once, just for the hard of hearing, we used the meaning in a way that you are unfamiliar with. That you cannot accept this is not our problem. And you can't accept that, because, as you highlight yourself, you only know 2 uses for the word. Seriously this putting words in other people's mouths really isn't your forte. :yawn:

Like i said, it's called communication and you are failing at it, badly.

The points your are making are all null and void because,
1) you are using a word in a derogatory way,
2) that word already has a derogatory meaning,
3) you can't communicate the difference as the meaning of both are the same.

"That you cannot accept this is not our problem."
This is not the statement of someone that is trying to communicate but that of someone that just can't.

Good night.

mashman
13th June 2014, 20:21
Like i said, it's called communication and you are failing at it, badly.

The points your are making are all null and void because,
1) you are using a word in a derogatory way,
2) that word already has a derogatory meaning,
3) you can't communicate the difference as the meaning of both are the same.

"That you cannot accept this is not our problem."
This is not the statement of someone that is trying to communicate but that of someone that just can't.

Good night.

You don't understand what I am saying. I dare say there are one or two around that do. Either way it doesn't matter because I know what the truth is. Therefore your views are inconsequential.

I understand the uses of the word as you interpret them, hence I gave a definition for how I have interpreted Akzle's version on the word. Hell, the cunt changed the spelling to avoid confusion. Fuckin peculiar behaviour for an antisematic bigot? Yup.

As for "That you cannot accept this is not our problem.". I bet you can't finish the following let alone understand what is being spoken about. If you do, then you will have grasped the meaning of "That you cannot accept this is not our problem."... and if that happens, you're going to laugh, I promise.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lhOX1aY5DE

Ocean1
13th June 2014, 20:24
We don't use the word in that way you are suggesting we do. I shall say this once, just for the hard of hearing, we used the meaning in a way that you are unfamiliar with.

I'm concerned, therefore that you may in fact not have attributed my use of the word "Arsehole" wrt your behaviour with quite the meaning with which it was intended.

Please reassure me that you in fact did understand me to mean that your behaviour is that of one who indulges in most or all of: http://www.thedipstop.com/Asshole.html

mashman
13th June 2014, 20:29
I'm concerned, therefore that you may in fact not have attributed my use of the word "Arsehole" wrt your behaviour with quite the meaning with which it was intended.

Please reassure me that you in fact did understand me to mean that your behaviour is that of one who indulges in most or all of: http://www.thedipstop.com/Asshole.html

My fuck cannot be giveth.

Brian d marge
14th June 2014, 00:59
I'm concerned, therefore that you may in fact not have attributed my use of the word "Arsehole" wrt your behaviour with quite the meaning with which it was intended.

Please reassure me that you in fact did understand me to mean that your behaviour is that of one who indulges in most or all of: http://www.thedipstop.com/Asshole.html

No 11 was fiiting

no 110 was an excellent arse


Stephen

avgas
14th June 2014, 02:28
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/ahv_1IS7SiE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Brian d marge
15th June 2014, 00:35
this applies to NZ , a well reasoned debate

Ukip

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/CqyeTvc6Iio" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Stephen

Brian d marge
16th June 2014, 15:11
loves the cock does our John


http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/opinion/10160935/Keys-US-trip-no-walk-in-the-park



Dont worry mr president we iz spending 38 billion of roads , so we are good for over priced gasoline for a few more years ...


Stephen

HenryDorsetCase
16th June 2014, 16:04
this applies to NZ , a well reasoned debate

Ukip


Stephen

59 minutes long and no tits or explosions? Now who's on crack?

mashman
16th June 2014, 16:15
this applies to NZ , a well reasoned debate

Ukip

Stephen

My Mum doesn't like ukip, so I'm not going to watch it. She says they're scarey... and she calls herself right whinge too :laugh:... in fact her and RT would probably get on famously given their love of Maggie.

Brian d marge
16th June 2014, 16:36
My Mum doesn't like ukip, so I'm not going to watch it. She says they're scarey... and she calls herself right whinge too :laugh:... in fact her and RT would probably get on famously given their love of Maggie.

Well how about fair and unbiased reporting from the bbc then

Snip; Ukraine is heavily in debt. A rescue package agreed with Russia was cancelled after the protesters forced out Mr Yanukovych.The International Monetary Fund has now approved a $17.1 bn (£10.1 bn) bailout for Ukraine the help the country's struggling economy. With funds from other donors, including the EU, the total package will be worth £32.1bn.
But the loan is dependent on strict economic reforms, including raising taxes and energy prices, which are unlikely to prove popular with voters.


Or how about Tony Blair " WE DIDNT CAUSE THE IRAQ CRISIS "

I just wish they would stop pissing around and let me have the chance to get me TV

like these fellas did,,,,

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/wJOZ2oCVmJo" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Stephen

oldrider
16th June 2014, 16:55
Well how about fair and unbiased reporting from the bbc then

Or how about Tony Blair " WE DIDNT CAUSE THE IRAQ CRISIS "

I just wish they would stop pissing around and let me have the chance to get me TV

like these fellas did,,,,


Stephen

The same people who gave their country away to Islam ... hope they don't think they can just turn up here when they have completely fucked the UK! :oi-grr:

Brian d marge
16th June 2014, 18:14
The same people who gave their country away to Islam ... hope they don't think they can just turn up here when they have completely fucked the UK! :oi-grr:

naaahhh was talking to Amos , from the woolpack he reckons Beckindale a great place and it will be a cold day in ,,, when the Sugdens leave the village

Stephen

Robert Taylor
16th June 2014, 18:17
My Mum doesn't like ukip, so I'm not going to watch it. She says they're scarey... and she calls herself right whinge too :laugh:... in fact her and RT would probably get on famously given their love of Maggie.

You forgot my other hero Enoch Powell

Robert Taylor
16th June 2014, 18:18
The same people who gave their country away to Islam ... hope they don't think they can just turn up here when they have completely fucked the UK! :oi-grr:

Yes them and a Scotsman named Gordon Brown accelerated the decline.

mashman
16th June 2014, 18:24
You forgot my other hero Enoch Powell

The turncoat eh... I think Dad was a fan of Powell :laugh:

oldrider
16th June 2014, 20:02
The turncoat eh... I think Dad was a fan of Powell :laugh:

Enoch was a bit before his time and was roundly condemned by those who have been proved wrong by consequent events! R.I.P. Enoch. :violin:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-433497/Widow-Enoch-Powells-Rivers-Blood-speech-really-did-exist.html

puddytat
16th June 2014, 21:05
The truths coming out

trickling out like the trickle down effect
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trickle-down_economics
Like a pleasant Golden Shower

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_shower_(disambiguation)

The TPPA

http://thedailyblog.co.nz/2014/06/16/the-mendacities-of-mr-key-5-has-tim-groser-shown-the-p-m-to-be-a-liar-on-the-tppa/

oldrider
16th June 2014, 21:58
I suppose that in light of the thread title and much of the banter among the earlier posts this post will not be too far off topic! :shifty:

A lady (now deceased) who lived around the corner from me was Oswald Mosley's sister and she gave us quite some personal insight of his life!

Now with the advent of the internet it is very easy to gather information on almost anything so I have been reading bits and pieces about him.

Here is a brief article about Sir Oswald and his British Union of Faschists the BUF: http://www.holocaustresearchproject.org/holoprelude/mosley.html

You might find it interesting if nothing else.

PS: Oswalds sister was as nice a "lady" as you could ever wish to meet!

Winston001
16th June 2014, 23:29
Faarrgg - Oswald Mosley's sister lived in Otamatata??

oldrider
17th June 2014, 10:46
Faarrgg - Oswald Mosley's sister lived in Otematata??

True! :corn: ... It's actually surprising the backgrounds of many who have passed through this little village over the years! :eek5:

Voltaire
17th June 2014, 12:58
Faarrgg - Oswald Mosley's sister lived in Otamatata??

Hitlers Sister in Law was Irish.....;)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bridget_Dowling
Its keeping on Topic ..sort of.

Apart from being one of the most evil men of the 20th century he made quite a lot of money as an author and licencing his image to the Govt.
Thats how he financed the Nazi party and bought Mercs.
http://www.celebritynetworth.com/articles/celebrity/rich-hitler/

Brian d marge
17th June 2014, 15:40
The truths coming out

trickling out like the trickle down effect
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trickle-down_economics
Like a pleasant Golden Shower

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_shower_(disambiguation)

The TPPA

http://thedailyblog.co.nz/2014/06/16/the-mendacities-of-mr-key-5-has-tim-groser-shown-the-p-m-to-be-a-liar-on-the-tppa/
and why isnt labour or the greens or even winston screaming blue murder over the ttpa
why because the bullies have more clout this time more money
watch iceland and hungary . i ponder on their fate after telling the man to take a hike

the man will wait, . . . .


stephen


Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

Oscar
17th June 2014, 15:42
and why isnt labour or the greens or even winston screaming blue murder over the ttpa
why because the bullies have more clout this time more money
watch iceland and hungary . i ponder on their fate after telling the man to take a hike

the man will wait, . . . .


stephen


Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

The man is too busy watching the likes of you...
Snug that tinfoil hat down tight, I hear the black helicopters!

Brian d marge
17th June 2014, 15:51
The man is too busy watching the likes of you...
Snug that tinfoil hat down tight, I hear the black helicopters!
i was wearing the same tin foil hat when i warned u of the tppa
the same hat when i warned u about student loan

electricity and asset sales the list is endless

but dont worry there are thousands if not millions who share the same belief system as your good self so you are well supported all is well in the garden

stephen





Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

Oscar
17th June 2014, 15:54
i was wearing the same tin foil hat when i warned u of the tppa
the same hat when i warned u about student loan

electricity and asset sales the list is endless

but dont worry there are thousands if not millions who share the same belief system as your good self so you are well supported all is well in the garden

stephen





Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

My last electricity bill was less than last year, I don't have a student loan, but I have got some Mighty River shares.
All is well.

Brian d marge
17th June 2014, 15:56
My last electricity bill was less than last year, I don't have a student loan, but I have got some Mighty River shares.
All is well.
it would have been cheaper never mind eh

half a crown was much to pay back and good luck with the shares

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

Oscar
17th June 2014, 16:10
it would have been cheaper never mind eh

half a crown was much to pay back and good luck with the shares

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

I'm just reading an AIG Management Liability Policy document, perhaps you would like to give me your opinion on it's suitability?

Brian d marge
17th June 2014, 16:12
Sure . .flick it over ill be glad to help


Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

Oscar
17th June 2014, 16:14
Sure . .flick it over ill be glad to help


Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

They (AIG) were kind enough to invite me to the Rugger.
US taxpayers dollars at work, eh?

oldrider
17th June 2014, 16:17
Hitlers Sister in Law was Irish.....;)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bridget_Dowling
Its keeping on Topic ..sort of.

Apart from being one of the most evil men of the 20th century he made quite a lot of money as an author and licencing his image to the Govt.
Thats how he financed the Nazi party and bought Mercs.
http://www.celebritynetworth.com/articles/celebrity/rich-hitler/

Why would a bank owned and operated by Jewish bankers finance Hitlers war machine when they were well informed of his intentions? :scratch:

The Bank of England at that time was not owned by England! :oi-grr:

I.E. http://aotearoaawiderperspective.wordpress.com/2013/08/01/how-the-bank-of-england-helped-hitler-sell-looted-gold-to-finance-his-wars/

What on earth did they have in mind? ... Perhaps the need to populate Israel once they forced Britain to relinquish it after the war! ... Just asking the question! :shifty:

Oscar
17th June 2014, 16:27
Why would a bank owned and operated by Jewish bankers finance Hitlers war machine when they were well informed of his intentions? :scratch:

The Bank of England at that time was not owned by England! :oi-grr:

I.E. http://aotearoaawiderperspective.wordpress.com/2013/08/01/how-the-bank-of-england-helped-hitler-sell-looted-gold-to-finance-his-wars/

What on earth did they have in mind? ... Perhaps the need to populate Israel once they forced Britain to relinquish it after the war! ... Just asking the question! :shifty:


Well, I'm convinced - it came from the Daily Mail after alll...








:lol::lol::lol:

Ocean1
17th June 2014, 19:43
Why would a bank owned and operated by Jewish bankers finance Hitlers war machine when they were well informed of his intentions? :scratch:

Now that's an inconvenient question. I wonder if it might require the dismantling of some trendy stereotypes.

Brian d marge
17th June 2014, 19:50
Now that's an inconvenient question. I wonder if it might require the dismantling of some trendy stereotypes.
for you yes

as i mentioned earlier if u remove empathy add the lure of money it all makes perfect sense

weapons of mass distraction anyone

stephen

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

Ocean1
17th June 2014, 19:57
for you yes

as i mentioned earlier if u remove empathy add the lure of money it all makes perfect sense

If you say so.

Me, I don't have stereotypes, don't have any loans so I don't need to vilify the banks, see.

Brian d marge
17th June 2014, 20:01
If you say so.

Me, I don't have stereotypes, don't have any loans so I don't need to vilify the banks, see.
you do

me

and next time you buy something that has gone up in price such um electricity

i wonder how the banks managed to do that , . . . .

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

oldrider
20th June 2014, 13:31
When I was a little boy most of the men from our country were conscripted to go to Europe and kill Germans that were threating the security of our country!

Today the government is inviting the offspring of that country to come on in and live here in comfort and threaten our security from inside parliament its self!

Did we really win the war? :scratch:

mashman
12th August 2014, 20:03
Commission bans Planet Key song (https://nz.news.yahoo.com/a/-/top-stories/24696311/commission-bans-planet-key-song/#)

oldrider
12th August 2014, 22:46
Commission bans Planet Key song (https://nz.news.yahoo.com/a/-/top-stories/24696311/commission-bans-planet-key-song/#)

That would have gone in Keys favour the only bad publicity is "NO" publicity! The more they played it the more his name would be mentioned! Suckers! :nya:

Brian d marge
12th August 2014, 23:47
When I was a little boy most of the men from our country were conscripted to go to Europe and kill Germans that were threating the security of our country!

Today the government is inviting the offspring of that country to come on in and live here in comfort and threaten our security from inside parliament its self!

Did we really win the war? :scratch:
No you didnt

But we

The english

Did win the world cup final

So i make it 3 nil in my books

Now if there had been a kiwi in the 1966 squad

Maybe we could see ourselfs clear to let you occupy milton keynes . . .but without the concrete cows they remain in british hands

As for the germans they are a nice bunch really

Easily led though

Stefan

mashman
2nd June 2015, 14:04
You’re a Criminal in a Mass Surveillance World – How to Not Get Caught (http://bananas.liberty.me/youre-a-criminal-in-a-mass-surveillance-world-how-to-not-get-caught/#.VWysenjhWds.twitter)... long read in english for the layman.

Akzle
2nd June 2015, 14:49
You’re a Criminal in a Mass Surveillance World – How to Not Get Caught (http://bananas.liberty.me/youre-a-criminal-in-a-mass-surveillance-world-how-to-not-get-caught/#.VWysenjhWds.twitter)... long read in english for the layman.

summarise it for me :bleh:

Brian d marge
2nd June 2015, 14:59
summarise it for me :bleh:
Would you like it summerized into NZ parlance or english

The first require lube and you assuming an interesing position

Banditbandit
2nd June 2015, 15:06
summarise it for me :bleh:

Fuck me - you can read .. and given your disposition, you probably should read that piece ... I read it - it is great !!!

Brian d marge
2nd June 2015, 15:17
Fuck me - you can read .. and given your disposition, you probably should read that piece ... I read it - it is great !!!
Promise . . .

Banditbandit
2nd June 2015, 15:29
Promise . . .

Yes, I promise ..

Brian d marge
2nd June 2015, 15:35
You’re a Criminal in a Mass Surveillance World – How to Not Get Caught (http://bananas.liberty.me/youre-a-criminal-in-a-mass-surveillance-world-how-to-not-get-caught/#.VWysenjhWds.twitter)... long read in english for the layman.
By the zionist river . . Where we were shipped

Another version was that the jews were offeredquite good terms to emigrate palastine
Remembering that gernan fearing a currency loss limited currency leaving
So you bought raw material from germany for palastine then emegrated arrived and sold the raw material with little loss
It takes 20 min using high tech equipment to cremate a body . . .6 million . ,hmmmmmmmmmm

As for the one world . . Its on track brothers and sisters


Nationals latest IMF wealrh transfer scheme looks like a winner

But 15 years for sex on a beach and the death penalty for a wank

Either way im fked


God help america . . . Cause the talmud wont

pete376403
2nd June 2015, 16:17
Pic stolen from facebook, but true none the less.

Oscar
2nd June 2015, 16:34
Pic stolen from facebook, but true none the less.

You can vote on all those things - it's called a general election.
Form a political party based on having referenda on everything and get elected.
Otherwise feel free to keep complaining as it is a free country...

Brian d marge
2nd June 2015, 16:40
You can vote on all those things - it's called a general election.
Form a political party based on having referenda on everything and get elected.
Otherwise feel free to keep complaining as it is a free country...
Very popular in some small african countries I hear

pete376403
2nd June 2015, 19:14
You can vote on all those things - it's called a general election....

Mmm, okay. How many of those things were part of the National manifesto prior to the election, so voters could make an informed decision?

HenryDorsetCase
2nd June 2015, 19:57
fuckin' 'ell. is this still going? Not bad bit of work for a drunken rant a couple years ago.

Carry on chaps.

Brian d marge
2nd June 2015, 20:16
fuckin' 'ell. is this still going? Not bad bit of work for a drunken rant a couple years ago.

Carry on chaps.
Who said anything about stopping

mashman
2nd June 2015, 22:55
fuckin' 'ell. is this still going? Not bad bit of work for a drunken rant a couple years ago.

Carry on chaps.

They told me to put it in HDC's fascist thread.

Oscar
3rd June 2015, 00:11
Mmm, okay. How many of those things were part of the National manifesto prior to the election, so voters could make an informed decision?

All those things existed before the last election.

Brian d marge
3rd June 2015, 00:56
All those things existed before the last election.

Opening up mental health care to the bond market ....must have slipped past me that one

Didnt see it on any billboards in Christchurch , or even norf canty

Stephen

wait I found it here on the IMF ( sorry I meant the american model , ) web site

http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/survey/so/2013/res050813a.htm

http://www.institutionalinvestor.com/gmtl/3296820/its-open-exchange-for-health-care-and-hospital-bonds.html


Stephen


IMF wealth transfer scheme , 21 b

Brian d marge
3rd June 2015, 17:12
All those things existed before the last election.

Hey Oscar

https://www.national.org.nz/policies

I think it might be hidden in the word " investment ......"

Stephen

Brian d marge
5th June 2015, 05:59
Dajjals most dangerous weapon is Riba

Brian d marge
6th June 2015, 05:47
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/x09XSa1X1eU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>


sharp 7 should do it

Brian d marge
25th June 2015, 01:58
Go Bernie

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/m0wp0kbBeJU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Stephen

puddytat
25th June 2015, 10:48
GOOOOO GREENPEACE!!!!!
That'll have the security wallies worried & in the age of the GCSB it shows just how a few people with commitment can make them looking fucking silly:niceone::laugh:

Brian d marge
25th June 2015, 20:49
GOOOOO GREENPEACE!!!!!
That'll have the security wallies worried & in the age of the GCSB it shows just how a few people with commitment can make them looking fucking silly:niceone:[emoji23]
They dont need other people to show them
They have it down to perfection all by themselves


Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

mashman
26th June 2015, 08:38
Terror arrests increase by 30% (https://uk.news.yahoo.com/terror-arrests-increase-30-152806216.html#ubQmEhQ)

GCSB Thought Police
26th June 2015, 14:03
GOOOOO GREENPEACE!!!!!
That'll have the security wallies worried & in the age of the GCSB it shows just how a few people with commitment can make them looking fucking silly:niceone::laugh:

We don't take any interest in actions like this.

As long as they are sitting on a ledge on Parliament Buildings we know where they are - and they are being dealt with by our enforcement arm.

And if we let them have a little play like this they will go off quite happy and feeling like martyrs - and won't bother to take other actions that we might have to step in and prevent.

They did give us a good laugh over coffee in our smoko room.

pritch
26th June 2015, 14:33
I think Greenpeace blew this protest. Nobody is talking about solar panels or renewable energy in general. The topic of the day was Parliamentary security.
Fail.

puddytat
26th June 2015, 19:08
I thought the topic of the day was twerking.?

You really think MSM is going to run with a subject that is so uncomfortable for Joe Mainstream to comprehend when it can go with a newsline that will keep him smug & happy in his servitude & he will be able to sound political, as he runs down the Greenies with his workmate Trev with the V8 & the fat ugly missus?.

Good to see you back GCSB......though I wonder why you fuckwits missed this, seeing as you spend the majority of your time NOT hunting Terrorists but Union reps, lefties & Greenies.
The easiest way around hi-tech snooping is no tech.

mashman
6th July 2015, 08:16
The government tried to stop this family from growing food on their lawn & this is what happened (https://www.facebook.com/freeworldcharter/posts/858486007540739)

awa355
8th July 2015, 13:57
We don't take any interest in actions like this. .

WOW!! gummamint spies, right here on KB? :Police::Police: Hey I lost all my contacts from my old mob ph. Could you look up all my stuff and send me a copy of my contacts plz. :laugh: Don't worry about nana's number, she's dead:no:

Laava
8th July 2015, 14:25
The government tried to stop this family from growing food on their lawn & this is what happened (https://www.facebook.com/freeworldcharter/posts/858486007540739)

I watched that and couldn't help feeling there was 2 sides to this story, the other side unrepresented. It very quickly turns into an RBE video. Is that why you posted it? I can't understand what really went on in this case? What is the local councils take?

willytheekid
8th July 2015, 15:07
They did give us a good laugh over coffee in our smoko room.

Yeah?

...and will you still be laughin when the people of NZ storm Parliment, and start kickin you & your mates coffee stained teeth down ya throat?...cos I certainly will be! :yes::nya:


Be seeing you soon! :cool:

https://creativesummercamp.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/google-angry-mob-cartoon21.jpg

...You reap what you sow!

Brian d marge
8th July 2015, 17:18
...You reap what you sow!


Sinsemilian acres of it . . .



Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

mashman
8th July 2015, 17:27
I watched that and couldn't help feeling there was 2 sides to this story, the other side unrepresented. It very quickly turns into an RBE video. Is that why you posted it? I can't understand what really went on in this case? What is the local councils take?

Woulda put it in another thread if it were Resource Based Economy related... fits just perfect in here :yes:. All they are doing is growing veggies. I don't see how that's any of the council's business. It's happening in a few places across the u.s. Smacks of businesses getting their noses out of joint, coz they're trading unfairly without using money. Wonder if it'll ever catch on :shifty:

Brian d marge
8th July 2015, 17:39
Woulda put it in another thread if it were Resource Based Economy related... fits just perfect in here :yes:. All they are doing is growing veggies. I don't see how that's any of the council's business. It's happening in a few places across the u.s. Smacks of businesses getting their noses out of joint, coz they're trading unfairly without using money. Wonder if it'll ever catch on :shifty:

Im going to use RICE as my future , money,

You can buy stuff from me using RICE ....Just as long as I can buy stuff from you using Rice..

I thought about using wheat or Rye .....but I would brew that and be poor again ....

As for the garden, That isnt the first time they have tried that ... last time I heard a similar story they were using a bylaw which stated ya front lawn had to be tidy ( as it lowered the property prices and people complained so the council stepped in )

They had a by law which stated something like , plants , flowers couldnt be more than X feet high...something like that

Do remember these laws are from the same idiots who say ya cant catch rainwater to use for your family and that the General lee was a racist car ....and bo and luke duke were queer......

Stephen

Laava
8th July 2015, 17:43
Woulda put it in another thread if it were Resource Based Economy related... fits just perfect in here :yes:. All they are doing is growing veggies. I don't see how that's any of the council's business. It's happening in a few places across the u.s. Smacks of businesses getting their noses out of joint, coz they're trading unfairly without using money. Wonder if it'll ever catch on :shifty:

I fully endorse people growing their own food, both plant and animal based. Do it myself in a limited way. But My point was that I believe there is more to this story than just some people growing veges

Laava
8th July 2015, 17:50
Im going to use RICE as my future , money,

You can buy stuff from me using RICE ....Just as long as I can buy stuff from you using Rice..

I thought about using wheat or Rye .....but I would brew that and be poor again ....

As for the garden, That isnt the first time they have tried that ... last time I heard a similar story they were using a bylaw which stated ya front lawn had to be tidy ( as it lowered the property prices and people complained so the council stepped in )

They had a by law which stated something like , plants , flowers couldnt be more than X feet high...something like that

Do remember these laws are from the same idiots who say ya cant catch rainwater to use for your family and that the General lee was a racist car ....and bo and luke duke were queer......

Stephen

So are you talking specifically about Florida? Or Texas?

Brian d marge
8th July 2015, 17:58
So are you talking specifically about Florida? Or Texas?
Oh I woyld have to check
I was one of those thing i read , picked up ages ago

The wayer harvesting i think also reared its head in bolivia

Stephen

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

mashman
8th July 2015, 18:26
I fully endorse people growing their own food, both plant and animal based. Do it myself in a limited way. But My point was that I believe there is more to this story than just some people growing veges

Yeah, sides of the fuckin roads should all be planted out for people to maintain/pick from... but hey, we're gonna be sliding into RBE territory there.

Like what? If it isn't illegal, then what's the problem? Healthy and safety not having their say on quality standards for gifts (like toy runs n shizzle ;))?

mashman
8th July 2015, 18:35
Im going to use RICE as my future , money,

You can buy stuff from me using RICE ....Just as long as I can buy stuff from you using Rice..

I thought about using wheat or Rye .....but I would brew that and be poor again ....

As for the garden, That isnt the first time they have tried that ... last time I heard a similar story they were using a bylaw which stated ya front lawn had to be tidy ( as it lowered the property prices and people complained so the council stepped in )

They had a by law which stated something like , plants , flowers couldnt be more than X feet high...something like that

Do remember these laws are from the same idiots who say ya cant catch rainwater to use for your family and that the General lee was a racist car ....and bo and luke duke were queer......

Stephen

Pressuring people to stop growing food coz it lower property prices :killingme :crybaby: Some people need a bullet for espousing such nonsense... Fascists.

Daisy. Bi?

Brian d marge
8th July 2015, 18:36
Yeah, sides of the fuckin roads should all be planted out for people to maintain/pick from... but hey, we're gonna be sliding into RBE territory there.

Like what? If it isn't illegal, then what's the problem? Healthy and safety not having their say on quality standards for gifts (like toy runs n shizzle ;))?
Already happening its called Gorilla gardening
And spare seeds just pop them into ya nearest unused or council owned ground

All KINDS of weeds have been grown like this

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

Brian d marge
9th July 2015, 02:52
This is how ya do it

<iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/iVBHQL3f6AQ" allowfullscreen="" width="560" frameborder="0" height="315"></iframe>

Stephen

hows that greek king ........

oldrider
9th July 2015, 10:27
This is how ya do it

Stephen

hows that greek king ........

All dependent upon protection by the myth of anti-Semitism and the ignorance of the masses! (Goyim - non Jew etc) Still stronger than ever today! :confused:

Hitler's Germany dared to expose them by controlling Germany's own money system and are still paying the price for that "crime" today!

Thanks again to mass ignorance of the Gentile or non Jew and the perpetuation of the anti-Semitic myth! :zzzz: Time to wake up? :shit:

Oscar
9th July 2015, 11:48
All dependent upon protection by the myth of anti-Semitism and the ignorance of the masses! (Goyim - non Jew etc) Still stronger than ever today! :confused:

Hitler's Germany dared to expose them by controlling Germany's own money system and are still paying the price for that "crime" today!

Thanks again to mass ignorance of the Gentile or non Jew and the perpetuation of the anti-Semitic myth! :zzzz: Time to wake up? :shit:

You are a very ignorant and very stuck record.
The only mass ignorance I see is vile old cunts like you who believe everything they read on the internet.

oldrider
9th July 2015, 11:58
You are a very ignorant and very stuck record.
The only mass ignorance I see is vile old cunts like you who believe everything they read on the internet.

You are a case in point - thank you for the contribution! :2thumbsup

Akzle
9th July 2015, 12:08
You are a very ignorant and very stuck record.
The only mass ignorance I see is vile old cunts like you who believe everything they read on the internet.

http://cdn77.sadanduseless.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/ir2.jpg

Oscar
9th July 2015, 13:05
cdn77.sadanduseless.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/ir2.jpg

You might wanna learn how to post an image, you Jaapie Twat.

Akzle
9th July 2015, 13:27
You might wanna learn how to post an image, you Jaapie Twat.

ahyes. The protocol prefix.

You might want to open your eyes to the horseshit and stop being blinded by your anti-anti-zionist/jew shit, (but nah, you dont want to eh). you jew cunt.

Oscar
9th July 2015, 13:45
ahyes. The protocol prefix.

You might want to open your eyes to the horseshit and stop being blinded by your anti-anti-zionist/jew shit, (but nah, you dont want to eh). you jew cunt.

You used to be slightly amusing, but you're just boring now.

Oscar
9th July 2015, 13:47
You are a case in point - thank you for the contribution! :2thumbsup

So let's get this straight - you think National Socialism is good for the banking system and that Hitler was hard done by?
Congratulations, I didn't think it was possible, but you're a bigger fuckwit that Axzle.

oldrider
9th July 2015, 15:49
So let's get this straight - you think National Socialism is good for the banking system and that Hitler was hard done by?
Congratulations, I didn't think it was possible, but you're a bigger fuckwit that Axzle.

Thats it just make it up as you go along - it probably makes you feel like a big shot quoting tough language from your keyboard - Pffft! :blip:

TheDemonLord
9th July 2015, 15:57
http://beforewisdom.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/godwinsLaw.png

Oscar
9th July 2015, 15:57
Thats it just make it up as you go along - it probably makes you feel like a big shot quoting tough language from your keyboard - Pffft! :blip:

I promise you that if you were to repeat some of the stuff you've written here to me personally, I would not stay behind my keyboard.

Notwithstanding that, this is the drivel in question:


Hitler's Germany dared to expose them by controlling Germany's own money system and are still paying the price for that "crime" today!


I'll repeat the question - you think National Socialism is good for the banking system and that Hitler was hard done by?

oldrider
9th July 2015, 16:35
I promise you that if you were to repeat some of the stuff you've written here to me personally, I would not stay behind my keyboard.

Notwithstanding that, this is the drivel in question:



I'll repeat the question - you think National Socialism is good for the banking system and that Hitler was hard done by?

That is what you say the question is not I - You simply don't have the mental capacity to understand. - End of story!

ellipsis
9th July 2015, 16:40
Godwins Law


http://www.bikeme.tv/index.php/where-have-all-the-flowers-gone/

mashman
9th July 2015, 16:43
I promise you that if you were to repeat some of the stuff you've written here to me personally, I would not stay behind my keyboard.


Violent threats because you don't understand a post on the internet. They should legislate against that shit. Let me know eh, I'll meet you at oldrider's doorway.

Oscar
9th July 2015, 16:57
That is what you say the question is not I - You simply don't have the mental capacity to understand. - End of story!

Ahh, the last gasp of the conspiracy theorist - the old you wouldn’t understand gambit.
So explain what you think was special about Hitler's bank system...

Oscar
9th July 2015, 16:59
Violent threats because you don't understand a post on the internet. They should legislate against that shit. Let me know eh, I'll meet you at oldrider's doorway.

Let me know the place and time.
As a matter of fact I did understand the bigoted old fool's comment, hence the reply.

ellipsis
9th July 2015, 17:00
Let me know the place and time.




....hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha...toscar is getting really excited...wanker...

oldrider
9th July 2015, 17:22
Let me know the place and time.
As a matter of fact I did understand the bigoted old fool's comment, hence the reply.

So you pick a physical fight with a pensioner and don't realise the situation that you have created for yourself - talk about a no win situation!

If you lose you will be a complete joke - if you win you will be despised as a thick yobbo! - (Then again probably no change either way!)

And you wonder why nobody takes you seriously. :o The only threat you are is to yourself! :lol: Better just stick to sending RED reputation! :stoogie:

puddytat
9th July 2015, 17:24
Someone needs to go out for a blat....actually we could all probably do with one.
That , or a wank.

ellipsis
9th July 2015, 17:34
Someone needs to go out for a blat....actually we could all probably do with one.
That , or a wank.


...sounds like toscar got caught having a toss behind the shed...

Oscar
9th July 2015, 17:37
Someone needs to go out for a blat....actually we could all probably do with one.
That , or a wank.

I think there's already a bit of wanking going on around here, to be fair.

husaberg
9th July 2015, 17:37
All dependent upon protection by the myth of anti-Semitism :

The myth of anti Semitism?. I would like an explanation of this comment Oldie, is it just a myth were Jews and other religions ever striped of nationality or persecuted or prevented from owning land or had all there assets seized. Was this all really just a myth?

Seems they were treated pretty much like we here in NZ treated the Chinese in the goldrush.
There is also strong parallels with how the Australian aborigines were also treated.
The treatment of the American Indians seems eerily similar also.
This is not even comparing the treatment of the Black South Africans.
Or the white Zimbabwean's or the native Zimbabwean's a hundred or so years prior to this.

Oscar
9th July 2015, 17:40
So you pick a physical fight with a pensioner and don't realise the situation that you have created for yourself - talk about a no win situation!

If you lose you will be a complete joke - if you win you will be despised as a thick yobbo! - (Then again probably no change either way!)

And you wonder why nobody takes you seriously. :o The only threat you are is to yourself! :lol: Better just stick to sending RED reputation! :stoogie:

I didn't pick a physical fight with you - you accused me of being a keyboard warrior and I told you what would happen if you (or anyone else for that matter) repeated some of the vile shit that you post. Then your girlfriend Mashy came to your rescue - it was him that I asked to name the time and place.

bogan
9th July 2015, 17:44
Ahh, the last gasp of the conspiracy theorist - the old you wouldn’t understand gambit.
So explain what you think was special about Hitler's bank system...

To be fair though, you wouldn't understand, on account of you not being a antisemetic fool. You only need to look at who he pairs up with to see that correlation.

ellipsis
9th July 2015, 17:47
I told you what would happen if you (or anyone else for that matter) .

... you would like to think you would... entertainment like you is hard to come by on a cold wintery day...

Oscar
9th July 2015, 17:53
To be fair though, you wouldn't understand, on account of you not being a antisemetic fool. You only need to look at who he pairs up with to see that correlation.

I reckon if I started drinking industrial quanties of cheap sherry now, I would understand him in about 20 years.

Akzle
9th July 2015, 18:19
You used to be slightly amusing, but you're just boring now.

i guess thats the difference between you and i.


...you skipped out the amusing part.

Akzle
9th July 2015, 18:23
I
I'll repeat the question - you think National Socialism is good for the banking system and that Hitler was hard done by?

oh noes! The poor banking system! So hard done by, by those evil evil, socialists!


Fuckwit.

Brian d marge
9th July 2015, 19:08
I'll repeat the question - you think National Socialism is good for the banking system and that Hitler was hard done by?

The question shows that ya haven’t quite grasped

A; National socialism
B; The bank and banking


I ll spare you the embarrassment , if ya just pop over and have a look at the Weimar republic .....

That might answer your question. ( ya wont look so much of a fool if ya discover the answer by yourself )


Stephen

Brian d marge
9th July 2015, 19:12
I promise you that if you were to repeat some of the stuff you've written here to me personally, I would not stay behind my keyboard.
?

Comedy Gold right there ...... the permutations are endless .....:nya:

Stephen

mashman
9th July 2015, 19:49
Let me know the place and time.
As a matter of fact I did understand the bigoted old fool's comment, hence the reply.

Well I'm here, and it's 7:48. You?
I have a different understanding it seems.

mashman
9th July 2015, 19:58
So you pick a physical fight with a pensioner and don't realise the situation that you have created for yourself - talk about a no win situation!

If you lose you will be a complete joke - if you win you will be despised as a thick yobbo! - (Then again probably no change either way!)

And you wonder why nobody takes you seriously. :o The only threat you are is to yourself! :lol: Better just stick to sending RED reputation! :stoogie:

:killingme.... canoot spreed ageen

mashman
9th July 2015, 20:05
I didn't pick a physical fight with you - you accused me of being a keyboard warrior and I told you what would happen if you (or anyone else for that matter) repeated some of the vile shit that you post. Then your girlfriend Mashy came to your rescue - it was him that I asked to name the time and place.

bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha haaaaaaaaaa

http://images.sodahead.com/polls/002683919/5652117351_MichWhambulance2_answer_1_xlarge.png

FJRider
9th July 2015, 20:21
I reckon if I started drinking industrial quanties of cheap sherry now, I would understand him in about 20 years.

No ... you wouldn't. But you'd care even less ...

Win win in my books ... ;)

Katman
9th July 2015, 20:55
Seems they were treated pretty much like we here in NZ treated the Chinese in the goldrush.
There is also strong parallels with how the Australian aborigines were also treated.
The treatment of the American Indians seems eerily similar also.
This is not even comparing the treatment of the Black South Africans.
Or the white Zimbabwean's or the native Zimbabwean's a hundred or so years prior to this.

So do we see you waving the Chinese flag?

The Aboriginal flag?

The American Indian flag?

The South African flag?

Or the Zimbawean flag?

No, you're blinded by the Jewish flag.

Katman
9th July 2015, 20:56
I didn't pick a physical fight with you - you accused me of being a keyboard warrior and I told you what would happen if you (or anyone else for that matter) repeated some of the vile shit that you post. Then your girlfriend Mashy came to your rescue - it was him that I asked to name the time and place.

Dude, you know where I am.

Stop in - I'll say it to your face.

husaberg
9th July 2015, 21:36
So do we see you waving the Chinese flag?

The Aboriginal flag?

The American Indian flag?

The South African flag?

Or the Zimbawean flag?

No, you're blinded by the Jewish flag.

I am not blinded by anything
I don't recall seeing anyone on KB saying everything in the word is

The Aboriginals fault

The American Indian fault

The South Africans fault

Or the Zimbabwean's fault.

Maybe you are just to dim witted to understand this. If you were only a little smarter you could separate the deeds or misdeeds of a few vs the behaviour of many.

Brian d marge
9th July 2015, 22:08
I bought a new zealand flag made in china that any good

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

Oscar
9th July 2015, 22:37
Dude, you know where I am.

Stop in - I'll say it to your face.

Another fucking moron. It was the silly old cunt who called me a keyboard warrior and I told him to repeat his vile shit in person.

oldrider
9th July 2015, 22:42
Another fucking moron. It was the silly old cunt who called me a keyboard warrior and I told him to repeat his vile shit in person.

Hey loser - watch my tricky left hook! - (I use my right hand!) - Pffft :nya:

Oscar
9th July 2015, 22:53
Hey loser - watch my tricky left hook! - (I use my right hand!) - Pffft :nya:

Did you learn that on the internet, you silly old cunt?
The only thing you use your right hand for is jerking off to internet hate sites.

bogan
9th July 2015, 22:54
Another fucking moron. It was the silly old cunt who called me a keyboard warrior and I told him to repeat his vile shit in person.

The really moronic thing, is if there was some new world cabal calling the shots from behind the scenes; it would be exactly that, behind the scenes, and spreading such vile hatred towards those who are not part of such a cabal at all merely plays into their hands.

Think about it oldy...

Brian d marge
9th July 2015, 23:15
The really moronic thing, is if there was some new world cabal calling the shots from behind the scenes; it would be exactly that, behind the scenes, and spreading such vile hatred towards those who are not part of such a cabal at all merely plays into their hands.

Think about it oldy...
Go and have a look at who owns what then come back and play
.and before you start
No im not spending any of my valuable time on this
Ive aleady done the leg work and know the answer
What you need to do is find out for yourself
Then maybe you might have a different question
Now it may just be coincedence but there are just too many dots lining up for my liking
When ya done that try to find the work history of john key and whats his name greene head of our rbnz

More dots lining up ? Or just a coincedence?

Finally try to find fairfax medias benefactors . . . .

Then report back

Take your time theres no hurry

Stephen

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

husaberg
9th July 2015, 23:18
Begining to think you may have forgotten to answer the question I posted a few pages ago Oldie, so I will ask again.


All dependent upon protection by the myth of anti-Semitism :

The myth of anti Semitism?. I would like an explanation of this comment Oldie, is it just a myth were Jews and other religions ever striped of nationality or persecuted or prevented from owning land or had all there assets seized. Was this all really just a myth?

Seems they were treated pretty much like we here in NZ treated the Chinese in the goldrush.
There is also strong parallels with how the Australian aborigines were also treated.
The treatment of the American Indians seems eerily similar also.
This is not even comparing the treatment of the Black South Africans.
Or the white Zimbabwean's or the native Zimbabwean's a hundred or so years prior to this.

Oscar
9th July 2015, 23:18
The really moronic thing, is if there was some new world cabal calling the shots from behind the scenes; it would be exactly that, behind the scenes, and spreading such vile hatred towards those who are not part of such a cabal at all merely plays into their hands.

Think about it oldy...

Oh yeah - a new world cabal would explain why he is such a loser. A perfect excuse for all his failures....

bogan
9th July 2015, 23:18
Go and have a look at who owns what then come back and play
.and before you start
No im not spending any of my valuable time on this
Ive aleady done the leg work and know the answer
What you need to do is find out for yourself
Then maybe you might have a different question
Now it may just be coincedence but there are just too many dots lining up for my liking
When ya done that try to find the work history of john key and whats his name greene head of our rbnz

More dots lining up ? Or just a coincedence?

Finally try to find fairfax medias benefactors . . . .

Then report back

Take your time theres no hurry

Stephen

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

Various people of all races and religions own all sorts of things...

Next...

Brian d marge
9th July 2015, 23:21
Begining to think you may have forgotten to answer the question I posted a few pages ago Oldie, so I will ask again.



The myth of anti Semitism?. I would like an explanation of this comment Oldie, is it just a myth were Jews and other religions ever striped of nationality or persecuted or prevented from owning land or had all there assets seized. Was this all really just a myth?

Seems they were treated pretty much like we here in NZ treated the Chinese in the goldrush.
There is also strong parallels with how the Australian aborigines were also treated.
The treatment of the American Indians seems eerily similar also.
This is not even comparing the treatment of the Black South Africans.
Or the white Zimbabwean's or the native Zimbabwean's a hundred or so years prior to this.
Ive answered it in my reply to oscar

Stephen

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

Brian d marge
9th July 2015, 23:23
Various people of all races and religions own all sorts of things...

Next...
No
If ya going to play ya need to bring some toys

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

bogan
9th July 2015, 23:25
No
If ya going to play ya need to bring some toys

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

I think you need to bring some logic. Like does a substantial ownership of a thing mean anything to the wider group? And could such a substantial ownership just be a cabal plant anyway?

bogan
9th July 2015, 23:28
Oh yeah - a new world cabal would explain why you are such a loser. A perfect excuse for all your failures....

Hypothetically speaking, it would explain that, but most importantly would explain why antisemetism is unjustifiable and most certainly not a myth; those two things are also the case if said hypothetical is not a reality.

husaberg
9th July 2015, 23:31
Ive answered it in my reply to oscar

Stephen

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

Stephen as far as I am aware you are not oldie, are you?

Brian d marge
9th July 2015, 23:31
I think you need to bring some logic. Like does a substantial ownership of a thing mean anything to the wider group? And could such a substantial ownership just be a cabal plant anyway?
See my first post
Start with substantial ownership
Media
Banks
Substantial assets / corporations

Reuters . . A trusted source of info

Banks . .help oscar answer his own question

Where would you like to start ( ̄ー ̄)

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

bogan
9th July 2015, 23:33
See my first post
Start with substantial ownership
Media
Banks
Substantial assets / corporations

Reuters . . A trusted source of info

Banks . .help oscar answer his own question

Where would you like to start ( ̄ー ̄)

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

How about we start by establishing how that reflects upon the wider group? Are they all party to that substantial ownership in some way?

Brian d marge
9th July 2015, 23:34
Stephen as far as I am aware you are not oldie are you?
An oldie

Maybe

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

Akzle
10th July 2015, 06:28
How about we start by establishing how that reflects upon the wider group? Are they all party to that substantial ownership in some way?



i dont think anyones TALKING about the wider group. As has been specified, many much times.

And im not anti semitic, i'm all about arabs.

Ya fucken jew.

Voltaire
10th July 2015, 06:53
https://ppm4u.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/images_fotor.jpg?w=551

Is the cold making everyone grumpy?

Akzle
10th July 2015, 07:16
Is the cold making everyone grumpy?

what is this 'the cold', youre talking about??


X - the winterless north

swarfie
10th July 2015, 07:35
[IMG]Is the cold making everyone grumpy?

No Grumpy here...think he lives in Canterbury somewhere:cold:

mashman
10th July 2015, 07:51
Various people of all races and religions own all sorts of things...

Next...

They own fuck all!

The End!

mashman
10th July 2015, 08:00
I think you need to bring some logic. Like does a substantial ownership of a thing mean anything to the wider group? And could such a substantial ownership just be a cabal plant anyway?

You're claiming that you'll be able to recognise someone else's logic on yet another subject that you have proven to know nothing about? bwaaaaaaaaaaa ha ha ha ha ha ha haaaaaaaaaaaaa you're such a :tugger:

Yes, it means that the wider group have no ownership and are therefore sheep. The OWNERS of everything are proven, else why do you go begging to them to resolve a dispute? Because they own everything! So simple my 10 year old understands such things :yes:.

mashman
10th July 2015, 09:36
Lee Camp doing what he does so well...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAVpDMy3RRA

Katman
10th July 2015, 10:01
But surely it's for the good of the people, right?

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=466&objectid=10880834

husaberg
10th July 2015, 11:51
i dont think anyones TALKING about the wider group. As has been specified, many much times.
And im not anti semitic, i'm all about arabs.

Ya fucken jew.


so. they cut the end of the penis off.
then they cut the penis off.
then they stitch another one on.
stupid ass jews.

jesus, you did get some, didnt ya. Ive explained my position. If youre unclear on it. Your problem. And no. The middle east was going good. Until Jews.


as for palestinians getting financial backing from anyone.. fuck it, mostly what they want is not to be bombed in their sleep, to have a better than 50/50 chance their children will come home from school, to not have to have assault rifles loaded behind their doors.
it is people, under modern day oppression, not by their own government, but by a fascist dictatorial regime that has NO FUCKING RIGHT to exist, let alone enforce their racist bullshit against a 'disadvantaged' population. cue "nuke them from orbit"[/


..."if it feels like it's everyone around you that is the problem... it might be time to have a look at yourself"
(innt nobody liked/s the Jewish. Ever. cunts should go back to the desert. also. they can take all the fucken jews with them.)

:laugh:
your dum bro.
Fuck ALL the jews.
And 99% of Jewish people, too.
Husa would be a jew, but she/he/it is just too fucken stupid.

youre getting hung up on that J word...
And no. Because hitler financed his little sortee with jewgold.
I submit that rejecting jewgold will have a fuken positive effect on peoples. Except jews.

hey! Thats racist yo! jews is the most opressed poorest boofuckinghoo race around man, you should feel sorry for them, or youre antisemitic!

butthurt jews! Liek omgwtflol!!
its totally like 1938 yo! Fuck, fire up the trains. Im Sick of the bullshit.

More poles were killed than joos, too. But hey. Inconvinient facts.

well, considering that wasnt even the worst Holocaust (tm)
(no,like, seriously, actually, jews copyrighted that shit so no other slaughtered or opressed peoples can use that word) but yeah. Pale folk have been a raping others for fuken days.

. *kill all the jew cunts .

...
innt nobody liked/s the Jewish. Ever. cunts should go back to the desert. also. they can take all the fucken jews with them.)

jews (israel) taxes palestinians.... Does not provide services. Most days of the week this is called theft.Oh yeah, its cos teh jews dont want to be held to account under international lore.Lulz!

jews!
Crime pays. Just not the average schmuck. Now, wonder what would happen to crime if jews and their jewgold were removed from the equation....

which dumbass expects that?
well, yes. he probably is. on account of being a rich white weasely jew fuck, asides anything else..

depends... Is there jews?

errr.... cos jews.
the grandest fucking ironing being, that after the 40s jewathon, they bought all the "bad guys". literally, bought and paid for them to come to america, dropping charges and protecting them from criminal persecution, to work for the US government... funded/owned by....jews!
oh what a tangled web we weave.

i'm not going to bother reading shit. tis the KB way.
but are you talking about "muskarah lending"?
if yes, then fuck jews.
if not, also fuck jews. cos they're still dicks. global enslavement and blah blah blah. (are the old whiteys asleep yet? best way for em.

i'm not going to bother reading shit. tis the KB way.
but are you talking about "muskarah lending"?if yes, then fuck jews. if not, also fuck jews. cos they're still dicks. global enslavement and blah blah blah. (are the old whiteys asleep yet? best way for em.

the jews took my glass

fuken jews
Fire up the trains its 1938 again remember that one.

bogan
10th July 2015, 11:51
You're claiming that you'll be able to recognise someone else's logic on yet another subject that you have proven to know nothing about? bwaaaaaaaaaaa ha ha ha ha ha ha haaaaaaaaaaaaa you're such a :tugger:

Yes, it means that the wider group have no ownership and are therefore sheep. The OWNERS of everything are proven, else why do you go begging to them to resolve a dispute? Because they own everything! So simple my 10 year old understands such things :yes:.

https://i.chzbgr.com/maxW500/8527298304/h57656BA5/

Don't mind addressing anything I've said, just continue with your ranting...

mashman
10th July 2015, 12:10
Don't mind addressing anything I've said, just continue with your ranting...

I did address what you said... and you're quite possibly the most ignorant, and most fascist like, of those that've trolled through the thread. It's entertaining just how stupid you are... and the company you keep.

husaberg
10th July 2015, 12:58
All dependent upon protection by the myth of anti-Semitism :


The myth of anti Semitism?. I would like an explanation of this comment Oldie, is it just a myth were Jews and other religions ever striped of nationality or persecuted or prevented from owning land or had all there assets seized. Was this all really just a myth?

Seems they were treated pretty much like we here in NZ treated the Chinese in the goldrush.
There is also strong parallels with how the Australian aborigines were also treated.
The treatment of the American Indians seems eerily similar also.
This is not even comparing the treatment of the Black South Africans.
Or the white Zimbabwean's or the native Zimbabwean's a hundred or so years prior to this.

Still waiting.............................you have had many pages now to come up with your reasoning for this comment oldie.

Oscar
10th July 2015, 13:02
Still waiting.............................you have had many pages now to come up with your reasoning for this comment oldie.

You'll wait a long time for reason out of him.
His MO is to post shit that he finds at the senile demetia end of the internet and then say he posted it coz it was interesting or something.
The fact that it may be vile propaganda seems to be lost on the old cahnt.
I doubt he understands half of what he posts...

Katman
10th July 2015, 13:22
The catch-cry 'anti-semitism' is thrown around simply as a means to try to shut down discussion.

It's an incredibly pathetic way to try winning an argument.

oldrider
10th July 2015, 13:45
The catch-cry 'anti-semitism' is thrown around simply as a means to try to shut down discussion.

It's an incredibly pathetic way to try winning an argument.

Something for the fuckwits to chew on for a wee while:https://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2009/12/15/the-myth-of-anti-semitism/

Already posted but ignored: http://www.reformation.org/khazaria.html

TheDemonLord
10th July 2015, 14:15
Something for the fuckwits to chew on for a wee while:https://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2009/12/15/the-myth-of-anti-semitism/

Already posted but ignored: http://www.reformation.org/khazaria.html

I think I see the issue here - there are in fact 2 separate discussions that could be had:

1: whether or not those who happen to be Jewish and in positions of executive power are working together to further their own aims

for this conversation I am in little doubt that it occurs, but in the same way as those who are Freemasons work together, those who are Christians work together, those who are African-American work together etc.

The next discussion is the pertinent one

2: whether or not blaming everything on the Jews is Anti-Semitic

For this conversation I say that it is. Now in a similar vein of the article posted - I am in little doubt that there are groups that use the veil of Anti-Semitism to censure discussion - again much the same way as people play the Race card to stifle discussion, the Sexism/Misogyny card etc.

The point I am conveying here is that whilst I agree there are probably some dodgy dealings going on behind closed doors, they are no more or no less dodgy than what every other group is trying to do and so to single them out as the sole cause is definitely anti-Semitic.

Probably the final comment is that anytime either side starts throwing around claims - the evidence presented tends to be rather flimsy and is based on a lot of conjecture, the conjectured 'evidence' is then used as the basis for even more conjecture and the end result tends to be rife with compound errors.

Katman
10th July 2015, 14:23
The point I am conveying here is that whilst I agree there are probably some dodgy dealings going on behind closed doors, they are no more or no less dodgy than what every other group is trying to do and so to single them out as the sole cause is definitely anti-Semitic.


And that's where you and I disagree.

I believe that evidence points towards a Zionist movement whose goal is to attain world domination.

oldrider
10th July 2015, 14:24
I think I see the issue here - there are in fact 2 separate discussions that could be had:

1: whether or not those who happen to be Jewish and in positions of executive power are working together to further their own aims

for this conversation I am in little doubt that it occurs, but in the same way as those who are Freemasons work together, those who are Christians work together, those who are African-American work together etc.

The next discussion is the pertinent one

2: whether or not blaming everything on the Jews is Anti-Semitic

For this conversation I say that it is. Now in a similar vein of the article posted - I am in little doubt that there are groups that use the veil of Anti-Semitism to censure discussion - again much the same way as people play the Race card to stifle discussion, the Sexism/Misogyny card etc.

The point I am conveying here is that whilst I agree there are probably some dodgy dealings going on behind closed doors, they are no more or no less dodgy than what every other group is trying to do and so to single them out as the sole cause is definitely anti-Semitic.

Probably the final comment is that anytime either side starts throwing around claims - the evidence presented tends to be rather flimsy and is based on a lot of conjecture, the conjectured 'evidence' is then used as the basis for even more conjecture and the end result tends to be rife with compound errors.

Exactly - unfortunately there is a lot of interesting history and information damned by a few ill informed opinionated people who obstruct simply for the sake of it!

TheDemonLord
10th July 2015, 14:25
And that's where you and I disagree.

I believe that evidence points towards a Zionist movement whose goal is to attain world domination.

I don't disagree on that - I merely say that EVERY group is trying to attain world domination.

Katman
10th July 2015, 14:31
I don't disagree on that - I merely say that EVERY group is trying to attain world domination.

Well I think you'll find that their control of the mainstream media and the banking system, and their influence in governments around the world puts them streets ahead of the rest.

oldrider
10th July 2015, 14:33
I believe that evidence points towards a Zionist movement whose goal is to attain world domination.

It certainly appears that way but there is much more to be discussed or revealed before that can be ascertained one way or the other!

If it is true as you say then it would appear that it is a forgone conclusion!

Also that they are as clever as they claim and maybe they deserve their place ruling the "New World Order" and the rest of us are as they claim - stupid!

It might save a lot of lives to simply surrender but they claim the battle is won anyway! :corn:

TheDemonLord
10th July 2015, 14:38
Well I think you'll find that their control of the mainstream media and the banking system, and their influence in governments around the world puts them streets ahead of the rest.

I think the Conservative Christian camp in the US would have something to say about that....

And that only extends to the US, the other Global Super powers (UK, China for example) don't have the same issues.

husaberg
10th July 2015, 14:41
Exactly - unfortunately there is a lot of interesting history and information damned by a few ill informed opinionated people who obstruct simply for the sake of it!



Something for the fuckwits to chew on for a wee while]

Maybe if you don't want to be challenged on your views, you should prove that you are able to quantify your posts


All dependent upon protection by the myth of anti-Semitism :


The myth of anti Semitism?. I would like an explanation of this comment Oldie, is it just a myth were Jews and other religions ever striped of nationality or persecuted or prevented from owning land or had all there assets seized. Was this all really just a myth?

Seems they were treated pretty much like we here in NZ treated the Chinese in the goldrush.
There is also strong parallels with how the Australian aborigines were also treated.
The treatment of the American Indians seems eerily similar also.
This is not even comparing the treatment of the Black South Africans.
Or the white Zimbabwean's or the native Zimbabwean's a hundred or so years prior to this.

Still waiting.............................you have had many pages now to come up with your reasoning for this comment oldie.

oldrider
10th July 2015, 14:41
I think the Conservative Christian camp in the US would have something to say about that....

And that only extends to the US, the other Global Super powers (UK, China for example) don't have the same issues.

I think you will find that they do - interesting to watch what is evolving currently around the world!

Katman
10th July 2015, 14:51
I think the Conservative Christian camp in the US would have something to say about that....

And that only extends to the US, the other Global Super powers (UK, China for example) don't have the same issues.

I think it is Zionists behind the New World Order that we are constantly hearing about.

I don't think the Conservative Christian camp have a snowflake's chance.

Brian d marge
10th July 2015, 14:59
And that's where you and I disagree.

I believe that evidence points towards a Zionist movement whose goal is to attain world domination.
We can until bogan has done his research and reports back

Then everyone will be on the same page

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

husaberg
10th July 2015, 14:59
The catch-cry 'anti-semitism' is thrown around simply as we are being racist. Being racist we object to this as a means to try to shut down discussion.

It's an incredibly prophetic way to win an argument. I don't like the obvious being pointed out.
Thus I reject reality and insert my own.


Here's the issue Katflap you are unable to separate out the hate of individuals actions, vs a group of people.
You are therefor a racist prick. I doubt you will ever see it, but plenty of others do.
Anyone that points it out is dismissed as a conspiracy, after all Why else should they judge you on what you type.;)
313589


I think it is Zionists behind the New World Order that we are constantly hearing about.
.
You constantly hear about it as all the same retards here post it all the time as being gospel.
You need to see this shadowy wholey Jewish conspiracy as it makes you feel there is a reason that you are like you are.
It gives you (in your head) a platform to spew out your racist beliefs
But it seems not all of your other conspiracies come true either aye Katman.

Brian d marge
10th July 2015, 15:13
Here's the issue Katflap you are unable to separate out the hate of individuals actions, vs a group of people.
You are therefor a racist prick. I doubt you will ever see it, but plenty of others do.
Anyone that points it out is dismissed as a conspiracy, after all Why else should they judge you on what you type.;)
313589


You constantly here about it as all the same retards here post it as gospel.
But it seems not all of your other conspiracies come true either aye Katman.
AsI said its been answered
But
The articles that have been posted have answered all of the question
As bogies and oscar will find out when they complete their work

In a nutshell

Snip
Refusal to recognize or support Israel has nothing to do with being “prejudiced against or hostile toward Jews” and everything to do with rejecting occupation, oppression and the myriad war crimes carried out by the Zionist state.
And im not in a position to check but I think anti semite just refers to the language not the race . . .i heard it somewhere and havent bothered to check

Stephen

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

oldrider
10th July 2015, 15:15
Here's the issue Katflap you are unable to separate out the hate of individuals actions, vs a group of people.
You are therefor a racist prick. I doubt you will ever see it, but plenty of others do.
Anyone that points it out is dismissed as a conspiracy, after all Why else should they judge you on what you type.;)
313589


You constantly hear about it as all the same retards here post it all the time as being gospel.
You need to see this shadowy wholey Jewish conspiracy as it makes you feel there is a reason that you are like you are.
It gives you (in your head) a platform to spew out your racist beliefs
But it seems not all of your other conspiracies come true either aye Katman.

You are a complete waste of space husaberg - I thought you were more than that but you're simply an unreasonable empty cut and paste artist! :bye:

husaberg
10th July 2015, 15:20
As I said its been answered
In a nutshell
Stephen

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk
I asked a question Oldie repeatedly has ignored it he has ample oportunty to answer and justify what he wrote.
posting links does not answer what his reasoning for what he wrote is.

Stephen lets be crystal clear here. Deriding a race of people based on their race is being racist.
Deriding an entire race of people based on the supposed actions of a couple of people is racist.
Do you disagree with any this.

husaberg
10th July 2015, 15:24
You are a complete waste of space husaberg - I thought you were more than that but you're simply an unreasonable empty cut and paste artist! :bye:


Exactly - unfortunately there is a lot of interesting history and information damned by a few ill informed opinionated people who obstruct simply for the sake of it!


Maybe if you don't want to be challenged on your views, you should prove that you are able to quantify your posts

Still waiting.............................you have had many pages now to come up with your reasoning for this comment oldie.
You know your own words, not links.... Your own words. So here is another opportunity to back up what you typed.



Something for the fuckwits to chew on for a wee while]

Maybe if you don't want to be challenged on your views, you should prove that you are able to quantify your posts


All dependent upon protection by the myth of anti-Semitism


The myth of anti Semitism?. I would like an explanation of this comment Oldie, is it just a myth were Jews and other religions ever striped of nationality or persecuted or prevented from owning land or had all there assets seized. Was this all really just a myth?

Seems they were treated pretty much like we here in NZ treated the Chinese in the goldrush.
There is also strong parallels with how the Australian aborigines were also treated.
The treatment of the American Indians seems eerily similar also.
This is not even comparing the treatment of the Black South Africans.
Or the white Zimbabwean's or the native Zimbabwean's a hundred or so years prior to this.

Still waiting.............................you have had many pages now to come up with your reasoning for this comment oldie.
You know your own words, not links.... Your own words. So here is another opportunity to back up what you typed.

Brian d marge
10th July 2015, 15:25
I think I see the issue here - there are in fact 2 separate discussions that could be had:

1: whether or not those who happen to be Jewish and in positions of executive power are working together to further their own aims

for this conversation I am in little doubt that it occurs, but in the same way as those who are Freemasons work together, those who are Christians work together, those who are African-American work together etc.

The next discussion is the pertinent one

2: whether or not blaming everything on the Jews is Anti-Semitic

For this conversation I say that it is. Now in a similar vein of the article posted - I am in little doubt that there are groups that use the veil of Anti-Semitism to censure discussion - again much the same way as people play the Race card to stifle discussion, the Sexism/Misogyny card etc.

The point I am conveying here is that whilst I agree there are probably some dodgy dealings going on behind closed doors, they are no more or no less dodgy than what every other group is trying to do and so to single them out as the sole cause is definitely anti-Semitic.

Probably the final comment is that anytime either side starts throwing around claims - the evidence presented tends to be rather flimsy and is based on a lot of conjecture, the conjectured 'evidence' is then used as the basis for even more conjecture and the end result tends to be rife with compound errors.
I could complete the trail from the khazars migrating to spain or from italy its like 2 separate groups just suddenly appear in spain and towards poland or up from italy into poland
Its important as jew . .and importantly zionists think that israel is the mother land . . . Which it aint for a large sector but on saying that sudanese jew . Ie non white jews because there would nothave been many honkeys around that area at that time
So sudanese jew could and probably would have come from the promised land
It looks increasingly like a certain group is manipulating the narative to suit there own ends

Imho

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

Brian d marge
10th July 2015, 15:31
I asked a question Oldie repeatedly has ignored it he has ample oportunty to answer and justify what he wrote.
posting links does not answer what his reasoning for what he wrote is.

Stephen lets be crystal clear here. Deriding a race of people based on their race is being racist.
Deriding an entire race of people based on the supposed actions of a couple of people is racist.
Do you disagree with any this.
No one is deriding a whole group
I have and others have been very careful to point this out

Unfortuantly the actions of a few are tainting the name of the many good bastads

But the narative that this small group want to impose is NOT what actually happened or is Happening

Such is life

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

husaberg
10th July 2015, 15:34
No one is deriding a whole group
I have and others have been very careful to point this out

Unfortuantly the actions of a few are tainting the name of the many good bastads

But the narative that this small group want to impose is NOT what actually happened or is Happening

Such is life

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

No one really? That's a big call to make Stephen. It might pay for you to have a look around bit at these threads.

Oscar
10th July 2015, 15:40
You are a complete waste of space husaberg - I thought you were more than that but you're simply an unreasonable empty cut and paste artist! :bye:

So why don't you answer the question?


All dependent upon protection by the myth of anti-Semitism

So which bits of histroy aren't true then?

The dispora?
The pogroms?
The Moors in Granada?
The First Crusade?
The Second Crusade?
Edward I of England?
"Zionology" in Soviet Russia?
The Final Solution?

You see, if you can't prove that ALL of these historical events (and others) didn't happen, then anti-semitism isn't a myth.
And that makes you (surprise, suprise) a liar.
Imagine that....

Oscar
10th July 2015, 15:43
No one is deriding a whole group
I have and others have been very careful to point this out

Unfortuantly the actions of a few are tainting the name of the many good bastads


Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

So, some of your best friends are <s>black</s>, um <s>gay</s>, er - jewish?

Brian d marge
10th July 2015, 15:43
No one really? That's a big call to make Stephen. It might pay for you to have a look around bit at these threads.
I know the views of those in question

Stephen

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

Brian d marge
10th July 2015, 15:46
So why don't you answer the question?...

Oh that is classic gold right there

Im still waiting for you to explain low interest rates

Btw thoae events did happen

But why and was the whole story told

You will find out in your research . . .

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

husaberg
10th July 2015, 15:47
I know the views of those in question

Stephen

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

You made the call Stephen.
Yokel, Axel, Katman and Oldie

Brian d marge
10th July 2015, 15:48
So, some of your best friends are <s>black</s>, um <s>gay</s>, er - jewish?
Yes to answer that question . . .

But any bearing on what is being said here

Bit early for cheap sherry aint it ?

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

TheDemonLord
10th July 2015, 15:48
I could complete the trail from the khazars migrating to spain or from italy its like 2 separate groups just suddenly appear in spain and towards poland or up from italy into poland
Its important as jew . .and importantly zionists think that israel is the mother land . . . Which it aint for a large sector but on saying that sudanese jew . Ie non white jews because there would nothave been many honkeys around that area at that time
So sudanese jew could and probably would have come from the promised land
It looks increasingly like a certain group is manipulating the narative to suit there own ends

Imho

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

Your comment.

It makes no sense.

I doubt it would start to make sense if you included some context or sources for what you are saying.

Brian d marge
10th July 2015, 15:50
You made the call Stephen.
Yokel, Axel, Katman and Oldie
Did I . . ,good on me . .been meaning to do something today



Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

Brian d marge
10th July 2015, 15:51
Your comment.

It makes no sense.

I doubt it would start to make sense if you included some context or sources for what you are saying.
Sorry thought you were up to speed on jewish history and the khazars

Sorry

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

Oscar
10th July 2015, 15:52
Oh that is classic gold right there

Im still waiting for you to explain low interest rates

Btw thoae events did happen

But why and was the whole story told

You will find out in your research . . .

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

So why don't you do the research about low interest rates, then?

That seems to be the way you operate - make a statement and then challenge others to research it - so google it yourself.

However in this case, I was addressing the question to someone else, so STFU.

TheDemonLord
10th July 2015, 15:53
But why and was the whole story told

I'm going to pick one (the Holocaust - mainly because it is the subject I have the most familiarity with) and ask this:

Skepticism that there are some facts we are not (and may never be) party to is one thing.

But it is a bold claim to infer that the Holocaust had a Why behind it that somehow the Jews were complicit in this.

You have challenged Bogan to do his own research - but on the above point (and your infered claim) can you cite some form of evidence?

TheDemonLord
10th July 2015, 15:56
Sorry thought you were up to speed on jewish history and the khazars

Sorry

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

you contradicted yourself at least twice in the waffling series of barely connected statements.

husaberg
10th July 2015, 15:57
I'm going to pick one (the Holocaust - mainly because it is the subject I have the most familiarity with) and ask this:

Skepticism that there are some facts we are not (and may never be) party to is one thing.

But it is a bold claim to infer that the Holocaust had a Why behind it that somehow the Jews were complicit in this.

You have challenged Bogan to do his own research - but on the above point (and your infered claim) can you cite some form of evidence?

You can't pick the holocaust though as Katman Yokel and Axel refuse to even contemplate it actually occurred at all.
It seems that if anyone did die in the camps it was merely a co-incidence an unfortunate result of disease or malnutrition according to what they actually post.

Oscar
10th July 2015, 15:57
Yes to answer that question . . .

But any bearing on what is being said here

Bit early for cheap sherry aint it ?

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

On the basis that most of your posts border on gibberish and lack any hint of grammar, spelling or basic English language skills, you probably shouldn’t cast aspersion of the alcoholic kind on other people, Bubb.

TheDemonLord
10th July 2015, 15:59
You can't pick the holocaust though as Katman Yokel and Axel refuse to even contemplate it actually occurred at all.

Well I can, that would just be a separate discussion (and FWIW, I have little tolerance for Holocaust deniers)

Brian d marge
10th July 2015, 16:00
So why don't you do the research about low interest rates, then?

That seems to be the way you operate - make a statement and then challenge others to research it - so google it yourself.

However in this case, I was addressing the question to someone else, so STFU.
Dude
I HAVE done the leg work

If you rememeber I challenged YOUR stupidity

And Im still waiting for your answer

Not my fault if ya dont know what your talking about

Anyhow . . How ya going to tackle this question
A. Ignore
B. Call everyone a cnt then disappear
C. Click on google and respond with some real info that might make someone think

Ive got the day off today and not much else to do
The barrel sprung a leak and the gold fish died so I cant take the occasional pot shot at them

So thank god you arrived

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk