
Originally Posted by
Mr Merde
Can anyone tell me what is wrong with Nationalism. Not as in The National Party, which is just a name for a conservatively inclined version of all the other political parties we have.
Nationalism where I want whats good for in the following order;
Me, my family, my friends, my town, and my country.
Where I am proud to be part of these groups and feel that everything I do, donate (pay taxes) and decide will directly be for the benifit of such.
I am very tired of my government giving away our hard earned monies to groups (Kyoto) and countries while there are people in my own country going without a satisfactory lifestyle.
They give away millions of our tax dollars for their pet projects and we suffer for it.
I dont quite come across with what I anm thinking so I hope you can make head or tail of my ramblings
Whats next?
Good model, close to federalism?
Guess you'd start by devolving more of central gumint's social management roles to regional versions (states?, councils?) and further to smaller neighbourhood groups.
Makes sense because it allows national infrastructure to be managed by a national group, regional management by that group and gives the possibility of a genuine neighbourhood contribution for the smallest group.
I also like it that it potentially means both regional and local groups would then be on a competitive footing. Don't think you're getting good value for your local taxes? Move. Not happy with the way they're budgeting for schooling or health? Move.
I wonder what range the spread of baby states would take after a decade or two...
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
Bookmarks